Do You Believe Dinosaurs Are a Hoax?

Unbelievably, there are individuals, such as Jeremy James, who ignorantly believe that “dinosaurs” (dragons) are a myth and a complete fraud. Not only do these people ignore historic writings where the authors describe dragons of varying types, not only do they ignore ancient paintings of dragons that just happen to resemble our “dinosaurs” of today, but they also claim that none of the ancient world dug up any such animals or recorded having dug them up.

First, the great catastrophe that wiped out the majority of these creatures was Noah’s flood; not some asteroid or volcano. Second, these civilizations likely encountered some of these creatures and killed them, and so were not overly surprised by some of them. Third, the ancients were not obsessed with the past or with dead bones the way we are. When they dug up bones, like any normal person, they discarded them. Last, the historical writings describing dragons (not the mythical Hollywood dragons you are used to) are clear evidence of their existence. Not only that, but do you honestly believe the Chinese have eleven real animals and one mythical animal on their calendar?

There are far more “dinosaurs” today compared to when I was a child. However, how many of them have actual fossils and how many are purely fiction, found only in books and videos? As I said in the past, one of their “dinosaurs” they have only ever found two arm bones and three vertebrae, and yet they show you what it looked like and give you a full back story on it. If you have never seen a human being before and all you find are two arm bones and three vertebrae, not only will you never be able to produce an accurate depiction of how they looked, but you also will never know how they behaved, what they ate, or how powerful they were.

Another dinosaur (I believe it was the Spinosaurus), they talk about how powerful it was and how sharp its claws were and built a robot arm to “replicate” its power and claws. All the bones tell you is that it once lived and is now dead. There is no scientific way that you could know how powerful it was or to accurately reflect it. This robot arm was pure conjecture. The robot arm can be as weak or as strong as you make it, and it was likely an exaggeration of the creature’s true power, which they claim its claws could rip right through a car door like butter. They have zero physical, scientific evidence of what these creatures looked like, how they behaved, what they ate, or how powerful they were. The shape of teeth does not tell you anything. If you find a well-preserved “dinosaur,” all that tells you is what its last meal was. For all you know, they were omnivores.

You need to learn to think critically for yourself and stop blindly believing all the crap these “scientific” liars hoist upon you. Everything they tell you about these creatures, where is the evidence to back their stories? Have they ever observed these creatures in order to verify what they are saying? Evidential facts get impaled by these people’s conviction of dogma, too. They only see what they want to see, what they have been told to see. This is why they never date the bones they find, because they believe by faith that they are millions of years old, and are afraid of the facts to contradict their beliefs. Ignorant fools, such as Jeremy James, who deny the existence of “dinosaurs” and the physical evidence before their eyes suffer from a special kind of delusion. But then again, Jeremy James is one of those ignorant clowns who believes the Earth to be flat and stationary. Go figure.

If “dinosaurs” are a complete hoax, as these individuals claim, then how do they explain this Mayan mural from around A.D. 600 depicting the head of a “dinosaur”? The head is clearly larger than the heads of the people carrying it. These people were not stupid (though we cannot say the same for many people today). Furthermore, how do they explain the Nasca Indians (c. 200 B.C. to A.D. 600) depicting “dinosaurs” in their art, as seen in the three stones below? What is even more fascinating is that Sauropod frills, such as seen on the Diplodocus in the second stone, were not found until 1992. Yet, they were being drawn correctly 2,000 years earlier by the Nasca Indians!

A stone temple in Cambodia from A.D. 1186 has an unmistakeable carving of a Stegosaurus on it. How did they know what a Stegosaurus looked like 800 years ago if “dinosaurs” are a complete hoax, or if they have supposedly been extinct for some “65 million years“?

In Acambaro, Mexico in 1945, a bunch of figurines were discovered. These figurines have been dated back to circa 2500 B.C. There were some 33,000 sculptures unearthed, hundreds of which appear to be dinosaurs, as you can see from the other images. And notice how Iguanodon was sculpted perfectly as we now know he looked today, as opposed to the early erroneous depictions. How do these individuals account for this? Was the entire world in on this fraudulent hoax prior to the 19th century when they first “discovered” them? These individuals, such as Jeremy James, are intellectually embarrassing.

P.S.: The reason I put "dinosaurs" in quotation marks is because the correct term for these creatures, before the crook Richard Owen coined the phrase 'dinosaur,' was DRAGONS. This term was being used for centuries before the mythical Hollywood "dragons" arrived on the scene to obscure the reality (the same way 'unicorn' underwent a definition change in dictionaries in favour of the mythical and dropping the reality).

YHWH Written On Human DNA

Yahweh (or Yahowah), the name of God, is written on the human DNA. The Tetragrammaton, YHWH, as God first identifies Himself to Moses (Ex. 3:14), corresponds to the numbers 10-5-6-5. “Coincidentally” (for those people unfamiliar with the law of large numbers) 10-5-6-5 is also the spacing of the base pairs in the human DNA.

This alone constitutes the basis for religious exemption of these toxic chemical cocktail bio-weapons falsely labeled as “vaccines”!

Former Moderna CEO Tal Zaks said, “We’re actually hacking the software of life.” For those with intelligence who not only have the cognitive capacity to understand those words but also have the ability to read between the lines (something the pathetic brainless hacks writing for so-called “fact checking” entities quite obviously lack), he absolutely did say that mRNA “vaccines” change your DNA. Only unintelligent clowns who lack the ability to read (or listen) and understand will attempt to deny this fact.

We are made in the image of God in more ways than one, and the enemy seeks to undermine and destroy this. The enemy frequently employs wicked men who also hate God to perform his bidding. Should it come as a surprise that they are trying to change man’s DNA to reflect something other than our Creator?

Daily Gaslighting Practices

The idea that you need to hold a particular title or position or that you need a degree in something in order to understand it is FALSE; it simply is not true. It is a fallacy and it is gaslighting. You do not need to be an “authority,” an “expert,” a “theologian,” or a “scholar.” (What even determines whether you are an “authority,” an “expert,” a “theologian,” or a “scholar,” since different groups have their own and they are not in agreement? What determines who is right?) It does not matter if you have a degree in rocket science or shovelling manure; if you can read and understand, then you are qualified to speak on it, providing you have actually done your homework and researched the subject thoroughly before you attempt to speak on it. Otherwise you are a mere fool who talks for the sake of hearing your own voice.

Atheists are typical of this. They want to gaslight you on what is or is not science (something they clearly do not understand themselves), what does or does not constitute as medicine, as well as all their other bogus beliefs, but when it comes to religion they are each somehow self-appointed “experts” who have never researched it honestly and do not have the slightest clue what they are talking about. They read/heard someone say something they blindly agree with and then they ignorantly parrot it as if having any kind of force of validity. It sounded good to them, so they repeat it. Even though the argument can be easily refuted ten different ways, they stand by it and repeat it no matter how many times you dismantle and obliterate it. They keep beating their favourite dead horses expecting them to magically get up and win them the race.

The key here is having the ability to read and to understand, which most of these people do not have. First, they have no interest in reading the Bible, let alone seeking to understand it. “If [you] never look to see what it says, [you] can’t test to see if it’s true or even take the exam.” Second, what little they do read they fail to understand. Or they talk to some clown who refers to him/herself as a “Christian,” but does not know the first thing about Christianity or the Bible and has several wacky beliefs, and ass-u-me that is what biblical Christianity is. It is easy to refute your own self-erected straw men.

STOP listening to so-called “experts” and “authorities”! Find out for yourself. THINK for yourself! Professor Richard Feynman has some excellent words for you to heed:

“Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”

“Since then I never pay attention to anything by ‘experts.’ I calculate everything myself.”

“Don’t pay attention to ‘authorities,’ think for yourself.”

“Have no respect whatsoever for authority; forget who said it and instead look what he starts with, where he ends up, and ask yourself, ‘Is it reasonable?’”

“SCIENCE:
If you don’t make mistakes, you’re doing it wrong.
If you don’t correct those mistakes, you’re really doing it wrong.
If you can’t accept you’re mistaken, you’re not doing it at all.”

“Modern education:
Creating people who are smart enough to accurately repeat what they are told and follow the orders.
And dumb enough to think this makes them smarter than everyone else.”

“The real problem with the education system is that it tests memorization skills, not learning or intelligence.
The two major aspects that lack in modern education systems are education and system.”

“The problem is not people being uneducated.
The problem is that people are educated just enough to believe what they have been taught, and not educated enough to question anything from what they have been taught.”

“When your ‘education’ limits your imagination it’s called indoctrination. Those who cannot think for themselves are truly lost.
Education should be a rewarding experience which allows you to think, imagine, question, doubt and solve problems.”

“Education isn’t about the ability to remember and repeat, in which people study to pass exams, and teach others to pass exams, but nobody knows anything.
It is the ability to learn from experience, to think, solve problems, and use our knowledge to adapt to new situations.”

“You cannot get educated by this self-propagating system in which people study to pass exams, and teach others to pass exams, but nobody knows anything.
You learn something by doing it yourself, by asking questions, by thinking, and by experimenting.”

“The goal of teaching should not be to help the students learn how to memorize and spit out information under academic pressure.
The purpose of teaching is to inspire the desire for learning in them and make them able to think, understand, and question.”

“Never confuse education with intelligence. You can have a Ph.D. and still be an idiot.”

“When you are dead, you don’t know you are dead. It’s pain only for others.
It’s the same thing when you are stupid.”

“Be careful when you follow the masses. Sometimes the M is silent.”

By the way, according to the Noah Webster American Dictionary of the English Language, a "scholar" is nothing more than "One who learns of a teacher; one who is under the tuition of a preceptor; a pupil; a disciple; hence, any member of a college, academy or school; applicable to the learner of any art, science or branch of literature." A "scholar" is not, as people tend to use the term today, an "expert" of some kind. So when ignorant people talk about "our scholars say/teach such and such," they are really saying, "our students say/teach such and such." Since when do we listen to students? Should you not be saying "our doctors say/teach such and such," since "doctor" used to mean "teacher"?

When some ignorant clowns says, "the scholars say this," make sure that you laugh directly in his/her face because he/she clearly does not know what they are talking about, and they are desperately reaching in an attempt to be right and make you wrong. This is no different than that child who always used to know someone in their family who just happened to do that particular thing that proves you are wrong and support his/her ridiculously asinine lies.

The Trinity

The expression of the Trinity is made throughout the entire Bible:

One God

1 Tim. 2:5; Deut. 4:35, 6:4; Is. 43:10-11.

Plurality of One God: Gen. 1:26; 3:22; 11:7; Is. 6:8.

Isa 9:6 shows the multiple persons of God as Father, Son, and Counsellor (a.k.a., Comforter, which Jesus said He would send to His disciples [John 15:26]).

The Father is God

Is. 6:3; 1 Cor. 8:6; John 17:1-3; 2 Cor. 1:3; Phil. 2:11; Col. 1:3; 1 Pet. 1:2; Matt. 6:8; 7:21; Gal. 1:1.

The Son is God

John 12:41; 5:18; 20:28; 1:1-14; 9:35-37; Titus 2:13; Rom. 9:5; 2 Pet. 1:1; Col. 2:9; Heb. 1:8-10; Rev. 1:8, 18; Is. 7:14; 45:21-22; Mic. 5:2; Matt. 1:23.

The Spirit is God

John 16:13; Heb. 9:14; Acts 5:3-4; 2 Cor. 3:17; John 15:26.

Who raised Jesus from the dead?

Father: Rom. 6:4; Acts 3:26; 1 Thess. 1:10.

Son: John 2:19-21; 10:17-18.

Spirit: Rom. 8:11.

God: Heb. 13:20; Acts 13:30; 17:31.

Who is God?

Father: Eph. 4:6.

Son: Titus 2:13; John 1:1; 20:28; 9:35-37.

Spirit: Gen. 1:2; Ps. 104:30.

God: Gen. 1:1; Heb. 11:3.

Who saves man?

Father: 1 Pet. 1:3.

Son: John 5:21; 4:14.

Spirit: John 3:6; Titus 3:5.

God: 1 John 3:9.

Who justifies man?

Father: Jer. 23:6; 2 Cor. 5:19.

Son: Rom. 5:9; 10:4; 2 Cor. 5:19, 21.

Spirit: 1 Cor. 6:11; Gal. 5:5.

God: Rom. 4:6; 9:33.

Who sanctifies man?

Father: Jude 1.

Son: Titus 2:14.

Spirit: 1 Pet. 1:2.

God: Ex. 31:13.

Persons of God do: Of the Father, by the Son, through the Spirit (1 Cor. 8:6; John 15:26).

Origins of Yahweh and Jehovah

In Exodus 3:14, God revealed Himself as “I AM that I AM” (יהוה). Sometime before the 1st century A.D., it became common for Judaites to superstitiously avoid saying the divine name for fear of misusing it and breaking the commandment, “You shall not take the name of Yahweh your God in vain” (Ex. 20:15; Deut. 5:11 — 3rd for Judaites and Protestants, 2nd for Catholics and Lutherans). Whenever they read Scripture aloud and encountered the divine name, they substituted another Hebrew word, “Adonai” (which means “Lord” or “my Lord”), in its place.

When Hebrew eventually developed written vowels, which appeared as small marks called vowel points and were placed above and below the consonants of a word, some Judaites in the 6th or 7th century began to place the vowel points for “Adonai” over the consonants for “Yahweh” to remind the reader of Scripture to say “Adonai” whenever he read “Yahweh.”

Around the 13th century, when Christian scholars took the consonants of “YHWH” and pronounced it with the vowels of “Adonai,” it resulted in the sound, “Yahowah.” This was then Latinized as “Jehovah,” the first recorded use of this spelling made by Raymundus Martini, a Spanish Dominican monk, in 1270.

Without argument, the precise vowels and pronunciation are unknown. While most English translations opt to use “LORD” in place of the Tetragrammaton, YHWH, the ASV (American Standard Version, 1901) and LSB (Legacy Standard Bible, 2021) are unique. The ASV opted to render it as “Jehovah,” while the LSB opted to render it as “Yahweh.” After all, it is God’s name we are talking about here, which certainly is not Allah.

The practice of rendering it “LORD,” as opposed to “Lord” (which typically renders the Hebrew, “Adonai”), follows the custom intitated by the Septuagint (which used the Greek, “Kurios”), and perpetuated in the Latin Vulgate. Some Judaite traditions, however, choose to render YHWH as “HaShem” (literally, “the Name”).

Proper names are never translated but rather transliterated. The letter J was the last letter added to the English alphabet. The Latinized Jesus (or Iesus, as it originally appeared) comes from the Greek, Iésous (transliteration of Ἰησοῦς), and the Hebrew, Yehoshua (transliteration of יְהוֹשׁוּעַ), which both mean “Yahweh saves” or “Yahweh is salvation.”

Since certain letters in certain languages have a different sound than in English, such as the letter J in Spanish having both an H sound (as in “jalepeño”) and a Y sound (as in “Jaci”), could it be possible that the Y and I words in Hebrew and Greek were pronounced with a sound similar to the sound of J in English? Well, according to www.howtopronounce.com, Ἰησοῦς is pronounced with an H sound (the same as the Spanish pronunciation of Jesus), and יְהוֹשׁוּעַ is pronounced with a Y sound. So where and why did words like Joshua and Jesus, which start with Y and I in the Hebrew and Greek (respectively), suddenly get the sound of J (such as George)?

Genius Betrayed

History is replete with stories of genius betrayed by backward thought and jealously, but most pathetically, by greed and money.

Forward momentum in humanity is always disrupted by these lame and pathetic culprits. Those with celebrity status, money, and political connections, due to their massive ego and stubborn pride, use ad hominem attack against their betters because they cannot engage them on the merit of their work. Three such examples are: Louis Pasteur vs. Antoine Béchamp; Thomas Edison vs. Nikola Tesla; and Richard Owen vs. Gideon Mantell.

If you cannot humble yourself to acknowledge that someone else’s work is superior to your own, and instead you have to resort to denial, deflection, projection, censorship, "cancelling," manipulation, smearing, gaslighting, jamming, framing, ad hominem, name calling, character assassination, intimidation, and the use of fallacious arguments that have no basis in reality, you are confessing your own intellectual bankruptcy.

When you cannot have a serious, mature, respectful, intelligent, rational, honest conversation, but instead have to go after the individual in order to circumvent what they are saying, in order to dodge and evade the issues (often by way of obfuscation, technicalities, ambiguous language, and equivocation), being unable to argue the main point and never providing a reasonable refutation or an intelligent counter-argument (merely presenting subjective opinions and irrational feelings), you are confessing your own intellectual bankruptcy.

Show yourself to possess integrity, character, and honour; be the bigger man and take the high road.

Reform and Conform Yourself to ALL Truth

"It is a small and narrow mind that is afraid to change; it is a sign of greatness that one is prepared to admit at times that one has been mistaken, and that therefore you have had to change your position." ―David Martyn Lloyd-Jones

Regardless of what the situation or scenario is (creation, religion, church doctrine, church practice, medicine, etc.), once you learn the truth, if you were conned, if you were manipulated, if you were lied to or misled (deliberately or ignorantly) and were wrong, it is okay to change course.

You should align with the truth, if you have any integrity, character, or honour.

Once you learn the truth and that you are mistaken, once you learn that you were conned, that you were manipulated, that you were lied to or misled (deliberately or ignorantly), if you continue on with the lie, now you have become a party to it; now you are aiding and abetting that lie and the perpetrators of that lie.

“You will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.” John 8:32

Anytime you learn truth, there is a sense of being set free; free from the chains that once bound you. If something you believe to be true tugs at you, you should investigate it, and do so with prayer and great discernment. Often people exchange one lie for another lie. When I was a child being taught about the Pangaean Theory, something deep inside tugged at me; the entire concept made absolutely zero sense unless every continent was nothing more than an island floating atop the water.

A word of caution: When you discover the truth, or it is revealed to you by someone else, often you will become angry and try to defend the lie. You will want to hold on to the lie rather than admitting you were conned, manipulated, lied to or misled. Your pride is a very powerful thing. Even as you fight the truth, the information will ring true with your core being.

“All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” —Arthur Schopenhauer