Saturday, April 8, 2017

Bill Nye Foolish Guy

Re: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPLRhVdNp5M
"In the process of science, as soon as you work backwards and introduce a miracle, a miraculous event, then it's no longer science." —Bill Nye
Which is precisely what Evolutionists have done with the Big Bang theory. In the 1920s they discovered that space is expanding, precisely as recorded in the Bible (Job 9:8; Psalm 104:2; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 45:12; 48:13; 51:13; Zechariah 12:1), and in the 1930s they came up with the Big Bang theory, assuming that the expansion meant that if you reverse it you arrive at a single point much like a drawing on single-point perspective. Not once did they ever put their thinking caps on and consider the problems with such a concept. What created it? What caused it to expand? If nothing means nothing, where did the dirt and dust come from that were apparently drawn together by gravity to form a ball smaller than a period on a page before starting to spin faster and faster until it exploded and began to expand? If there were dust and dirt in the vast nothingness, where did gravity come from? What caused the gathered dust and dirt to start spinning? The Law of Inertia states than any object in motion, any pieces that fall off or break off from that object will continue spinning in the same direction until they encounter resistance. If nothing means nothing, what possible resistance could these pieces ever encounter in order to alter their direction? The further out the pieces got, the farther apart they would be from each other. In other words, every planet and moon in our universe ought to be spinning and traveling in the same direction.

Furthermore, that is precisely what Evolutionists have done with the theory of Evolution. They claim that birds were once lizards and lizards were once fish and so on and so on. Not only is there absolutely zero evidence to support such nonsense, but the DNA of every plant and animal on this planet is unique to itself and its own kind. You can have loss of existing information, such as a child being born without an arm or a leg, and you can have mutation of existing information, such as a child being born with an extra arm or leg, but there has never been the addition of new information. It is impossible! The information that is there can only reproduce after the information that is there. Every human being that is on this planet came from another human being. And if you take any two human beings today—Caucasian and African, Asian and South American, Indian and British, Spanish and Australian, etc.—the result will be another human being. Human beings never came from apes, monkeys, chimpanzees or anything else. Human beings have always been human beings. Birds have always been birds. Lizards have always been lizards. Fish have always been fish. There is not one single intermediary fossil in existence. Not a single creature evolved into a completely different creature. It simply did not happen!
"In science class there's no supernatural explanations." —Bill Nye
Except for the Big Bang theory. Except for the Evolution theory. Except for the Pangaea theory. All supernatural explanations for which there is absolutely zero evidence to support them. Mr. Nye fails to see the difference between science—that which is testable and observable—and supernatural. Everything just discussed above is entirely supernatural. From nothing—nothing means nothing—comes absolutely everything? Dirt created everything? Dirt is eternal?

The theory of Evolution teaches that we evolved from a rock. Follow their story backward some time. From a big molten rock, somehow it miraculously rained on this molten rock in order to cool it, and somehow non-existent organisms miraculously began to exist in the water before eventually evolving into everything we see around us today. The only "evolution" we observe scientifically is that of micro-evolution, or more accurately described as adaptation. Certain salt-water fish have adapted to fresh water, and certain fresh-water fish have adapted to salt water. It is not evolution. An animal growing a thicker coat of fur in the winter and shedding that coat of fur in the summer is an adaptation. If humans move to colder or hotter climates, we can adapt. Macro-evolution is complete and utter imaginative nonsense. The complex intricacies of every plant and animal on this planet disprove the theory of Evolution. Evolutionists would do well to use their eyes and look at the complexities that exist within every plant and animal. Every plant and animal is unique. Hold a rat in your hands and examine it closely. Do the same with a gerbil and a hamster and a mouse. These plants and animals are extraordinary. To argue that they evolved is ridiculous and anti-intellectual.
"People on the outside, from a non-supernatural standpoint, have shown that your worldview could not possibly have happened." —Bill Nye
Not true in the least, Mr. Nye. Examine everything I have just discussed above and you will see that the Evolutionist's worldview could not possibly have happened. There is absolutely zero evidence to support it, and using science and the scientific method we see absolutely zero such miraculous things happening today. The Evolutionist worldview is bankrupt. Every branch of science irrefutably and undeniably points toward intelligent design. Something had to create what we see around us. Either it was an intelligent being—God, or it was dirt. Either God is eternal, or dirt is eternal. Only one of those two choices makes any sense. Science cannot explain everything in the physical world, so how does one assume it is going to be able to explain anything in the supernatural world? Mr. Nye attempts to dismiss creation as being supernatural, but it is nowhere near as supernatural as the Big Bang theory and the theory of Evolution. There is zero science to support either of those two theories.

Evolutionists need to remember and pay attention to every law that governs our universe. Every law that governs our universe utterly obliterates the theory of Evolution. Simple mathematical equations combined with what we can test and observe (science) in our universe utterly obliterate the theory of Evolution. Observe:
#1. It is a scientific fact that the sun burns off X amount of gas every day. You can measure this and then apply simple mathematics to it. If you multiply that number by only 1 million years, you have a problem. The sun was once so big that it would have touched the Earth.

#2. It is a scientific fact that the moon is moving away from the Earth by X amount of distance every year. You can measure this and then apply simple mathematics to it. If you multiply that number by only 1 million years, you have a problem. The moon would have been so close to the Earth that the tall dinosaurs (previously called dragons) would have been mooned. There is a scientific law, called the Inverse Square Law, that states if you half the distance you quadruple the effect. If you were to move the moon in half of its current distance, the Earth would have been flooded twice a day due to the effects of the moon on the water. If you use the rate at which the moon is moving away from the Earth, at only 1.4 million years, let alone "billions" of years, the Earth and the moon would have occupied the same space.

#3. It is a scientific fact that the Earth is slowing down by X amount every year. You can measure this and then apply simple mathematics to it. If you multiply that number by only 1 million years, you have a problem. The Earth would have been spinning so fast at one time that everything on the surface would have been thrown off into outer space. Before you attempt to argue the egregious and erroneous theory that gravity would have been increased, try thinking about a merry-go-round. The faster you get that thing going, what happens? You get forced to the outside. Gravity does not increase.

#4. Consider a spinning wheel. It is a scientific fact that the outside of the wheel has to turn faster than the inside of the wheel. Now go take a look at the Milky Way, or any number of our other spiral galaxies. They are spinning in the reverse. Ergo, you have a problem. If our universe were only 1 million years old, the Milky Way would not look the way it currently does.

#5. It is a scientific fact that the Earth's magnetic field is decaying; it is getting weaker. You can measure this and then apply simple mathematics to it. If you go back only 1 million years, you have a problem. Earth's magnetic field would have been so strong that it would have ripped the iron from your blood.

#6. It is a scientific fact that Jupiter emits twice as much energy as it receives from the sun. Neptune emits even more. You can measure this and then apply simple mathematics to it. How do these planets still have warmth and energy if they are "millions," let alone "billions," of years old? It is impossible! Secular "scientists" cannot even explain this. The evidence contradicts their theory.
The existence and nature of numbers utterly obliterates the theory of Evolution (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkwCl0ymTfg). Why does the physical world obey the laws of mathematics? Secular atheist evolutionary "scientists" cannot explain it because their worldview is bankrupt. Humans did not create numbers; we discovered them. Where did they come from? They are the same everywhere you go.

Here are just a couple of things that science used to teach and believe many, many years ago (because they refused to believe the Bible):
  1. the earth was flat
  2. only 1,100 stars
  3. earth sat on a large animal
  4. nothing—science was ignorant on the subject of invisible elements in creation
  5. all stars were the same
  6. light was fixed in a place
  7. air was weightless
  8. winds blew straight
  9. sick people must be bled (This is how one of the Presidents of the USA died.)
  10. the ocean floor was flat
  11. oceans fed by only by rivers and rain
  12. hands washed in still water
This is what science knows today, and the passage of Scripture that it is found in. Bear in mind that parts of the Bible were written 2,000 to 4,000 years ago.
  1. the earth is a sphere (Isaiah 40:22)
  2. incalculable number of stars (Jeremiah 33:22)
  3. free float of earth in space (Job 26:7)
  4. creation made of invisible elements—atoms (Hebrews 11:3)
  5. each star is different (1 Corinthians 15:41)
  6. light moves (Job 38:19-20)
  7. air has weight (Job 28:25)
  8. winds blow in cyclones (Ecclesiastes 1:6)
  9. blood is the source of life and health (Leviticus 17:11)
  10. ocean floor contains deep valleys and mountains (2 Samuel 22:16; Jonah 2:6)
  11. ocean contains springs (Job 28:6)
  12. when dealing with disease, hands should be washed under running water (Leviticus 15:13)
Here are some questions to stimulate your thinking process and to get you started on thinking correctly and objectively for yourself rather than being spoon-fed a fantastically fabulous imaginative fairy tale.
  1. Where did the space for the universe come from?
  2. Where did matter come from?
  3. Where did the laws of the universe come from (gravity, inertia, etc.)?
  4. How did matter get so perfectly organized?
  5. Where did the energy come from to do all the organizing?
  6. When, where, why, and how did life come from dead matter?
  7. When, where, why, and how did life learn to reproduce itself?
  8. With what did the first cell capable of sexual reproduction reproduce?
  9. Why would any plant or animal want to reproduce more of its kind since this would only make more mouths to feed and decrease the chances of survival? (Does the individual have a drive to survive, or the species? How do you explain this?)
  10. How can mutations (recombining of the genetic code) create any new, improved varieties? (Recombining the English letters will never produce Chinese books.)
  11. Is it possible that similarities in design between different animals prove a common Creator instead of a common ancestor?
  12. Natural selection only works with the genetic information available and tends only to keep a species stable. How would you explain the increasing complexity in the genetic code that must have occurred if evolution were true?
  13. When, where, why, and how did:
    1. Single-celled plants become multi-celled? (Where are the two- and three-celled intermediates?)
    2. Single-celled animals evolve?
    3. Fish change to amphibians?
    4. Amphibians change to reptiles?
    5. Reptiles change to birds? (The lungs, bones, eyes, reproductive organs, heart, method of locomotion, body covering, etc., are all very different!) How did the intermediate forms live?
  14. When, where, why, how, and from what did:
    1. Whales evolve?
    2. Sea horses evolve?
    3. Bats evolve?
    4. Eyes evolve?
    5. Ears evolve?
    6. Hair, skin, feathers, scales, nails, claws, etc., evolve?
  15. Which evolved first (how, and how long, did it work without the others)?
    1. The digestive system, the food to be digested, the appetite, the ability to find and eat the food, the digestive juices, or the body’s resistance to its own digestive juice (stomach, intestines, etc.)?
    2. The drive to reproduce or the ability to reproduce?
    3. The lungs, the mucus lining to protect them, the throat, or the perfect mixture of gases to be breathed into the lungs?
    4. DNA or RNA to carry the DNA message to cell parts?
    5. The termite or the flagella in its intestines that actually digest the cellulose?
    6. The plants or the insects that live on and pollinate the plants?
    7. The bones, ligaments, tendons, blood supply, or muscles to move the bones?
    8. The nervous system, repair system, or hormone system?
    9. The immune system or the need for it?
  16. There are many thousands of examples of symbiosis that defy an evolutionary explanation. Why must we teach students that evolution is the only explanation for these relationships?
  17. How would evolution explain mimicry? Did the plants and animals develop mimicry by chance, by their intelligent choice, or by design?
  18. When, where, why, and how did man evolve feelings? Love, mercy, guilt, etc. would never evolve in the theory of evolution.
  19. How did photosynthesis evolve?
  20. How did thought evolve?
  21. How did flowering plants evolve, and from what?
  22. What kind of evolutionist are you? Why are you not one of the other eight or ten kinds?
  23. What would you have said fifty years ago if I told you I had a living coelacanth in my aquarium?
  24. Is there one clear prediction of macro-evolution that has proved true?
  25. What is so scientific about the idea of hydrogen gas becoming human?
  26. Do you honestly believe that everything came from nothing?
  27. When, where, why, and how did matter create DNA, which is an intricately complex language system?
  28. When, where, why, how, and from what did numbers evolve? Why does our entire physical world obey the laws of mathematics?
These are things that secular atheistic evolutionary "scientists" cannot explain. Secular atheistic evolutionary "scientists" are dishonest, untrustworthy, and blatant liars.  Every shred of evidence on this planet and every shred of evidence in outer space all indicate a universe and Earth that are less than 10,000 years old! Science done properly supports the Christian worldview. Period!