Do You Believe Dinosaurs Are a Hoax?

Unbelievably, there are individuals, such as Jeremy James, who ignorantly believe that “dinosaurs” (dragons) are a myth and a complete fraud. Not only do these people ignore historic writings where the authors describe dragons of varying types, not only do they ignore ancient paintings of dragons that just happen to resemble our “dinosaurs” of today, but they also claim that none of the ancient world dug up any such animals or recorded having dug them up.

First, the great catastrophe that wiped out the majority of these creatures was Noah’s flood; not some asteroid or volcano. Second, these civilizations likely encountered some of these creatures and killed them, and so were not overly surprised by some of them. Third, the ancients were not obsessed with the past or with dead bones the way we are. When they dug up bones, like any normal person, they discarded them. Last, the historical writings describing dragons (not the mythical Hollywood dragons you are used to) are clear evidence of their existence. Not only that, but do you honestly believe the Chinese have eleven real animals and one mythical animal on their calendar?

There are far more “dinosaurs” today compared to when I was a child. However, how many of them have actual fossils and how many are purely fiction, found only in books and videos? As I said in the past, one of their “dinosaurs” they have only ever found two arm bones and three vertebrae, and yet they show you what it looked like and give you a full back story on it. If you have never seen a human being before and all you find are two arm bones and three vertebrae, not only will you never be able to produce an accurate depiction of how they looked, but you also will never know how they behaved, what they ate, or how powerful they were.

Another dinosaur (I believe it was the Spinosaurus), they talk about how powerful it was and how sharp its claws were and built a robot arm to “replicate” its power and claws. All the bones tell you is that it once lived and is now dead. There is no scientific way that you could know how powerful it was or to accurately reflect it. This robot arm was pure conjecture. The robot arm can be as weak or as strong as you make it, and it was likely an exaggeration of the creature’s true power, which they claim its claws could rip right through a car door like butter. They have zero physical, scientific evidence of what these creatures looked like, how they behaved, what they ate, or how powerful they were. The shape of teeth does not tell you anything. If you find a well-preserved “dinosaur,” all that tells you is what its last meal was. For all you know, they were omnivores.

You need to learn to think critically for yourself and stop blindly believing all the crap these “scientific” liars hoist upon you. Everything they tell you about these creatures, where is the evidence to back their stories? Have they ever observed these creatures in order to verify what they are saying? Evidential facts get impaled by these people’s conviction of dogma, too. They only see what they want to see, what they have been told to see. This is why they never date the bones they find, because they believe by faith that they are millions of years old, and are afraid of the facts to contradict their beliefs. Ignorant fools, such as Jeremy James, who deny the existence of “dinosaurs” and the physical evidence before their eyes suffer from a special kind of delusion. But then again, Jeremy James is one of those ignorant clowns who believes the Earth to be flat and stationary. Go figure.

If “dinosaurs” are a complete hoax, as these individuals claim, then how do they explain this Mayan mural from around A.D. 600 depicting the head of a “dinosaur”? The head is clearly larger than the heads of the people carrying it. These people were not stupid (though we cannot say the same for many people today). Furthermore, how do they explain the Nasca Indians (c. 200 B.C. to A.D. 600) depicting “dinosaurs” in their art, as seen in the three stones below? What is even more fascinating is that Sauropod frills, such as seen on the Diplodocus in the second stone, were not found until 1992. Yet, they were being drawn correctly 2,000 years earlier by the Nasca Indians!

A stone temple in Cambodia from A.D. 1186 has an unmistakeable carving of a Stegosaurus on it. How did they know what a Stegosaurus looked like 800 years ago if “dinosaurs” are a complete hoax, or if they have supposedly been extinct for some “65 million years“?

In Acambaro, Mexico in 1945, a bunch of figurines were discovered. These figurines have been dated back to circa 2500 B.C. There were some 33,000 sculptures unearthed, hundreds of which appear to be dinosaurs, as you can see from the other images. And notice how Iguanodon was sculpted perfectly as we now know he looked today, as opposed to the early erroneous depictions. How do these individuals account for this? Was the entire world in on this fraudulent hoax prior to the 19th century when they first “discovered” them? These individuals, such as Jeremy James, are intellectually embarrassing.

P.S.: The reason I put "dinosaurs" in quotation marks is because the correct term for these creatures, before the crook Richard Owen coined the phrase 'dinosaur,' was DRAGONS. This term was being used for centuries before the mythical Hollywood "dragons" arrived on the scene to obscure the reality (the same way 'unicorn' underwent a definition change in dictionaries in favour of the mythical and dropping the reality).

Medicine

Mainstream medicine, also known as Western medicine — the true alternative medicine — is pseudoscientific, based entirely upon superstition (the "germ theory"), and merely treats symptoms with its opposite. This is why it is referred to as Allopathic medicine or Allopathy. The word “allopathic” comes from the Greek “allos” — meaning “opposite” — and “pathos” — meaning “to suffer.” All it attempts to do, by most egotistical “doctors” who think they know everything and have all the answers (despite their records of maltreatment and/or malpractice), is treat the symptoms (of which many illnesses share) rather than the patient. It uses Band Aid solutions rather than dealing with the root cause. Allopathic medicine is no scientific medical care.

Real medicine, used for thousands of years before half-wit hacks like Louis Pasteur promoted the unscientific “germ theory” and “contagion theory,” (neither of which has been proven using the scientific method), treated the patient rather than the symptoms (of which multiple illnesses share). It treated like with like. Naturopathic medicine or Naturopathy (“Natura” meaning “nature.”), which includes Homeopathic medicine or Homeopathy (“Homeo” meaning “similar to.”) and Osteopathic medicine or Osteopathy (“Osteon” meaning “bones.”), is the true form of medicine, treating the patient rather than the symptoms. From TCM to Ayurveda to Native Americans, natural medicine has been healing people for centuries. That is a better track record than modern Allopathic “medicine.” Emergency medicine is also scientific medicine that benefits the patient.

Greek physician Hippocrates is considered the “father of medicine.” He accurately stated, “Diseases of any kind are crises of purification, of toxic elimination. Symptoms are the natural defenses of the body. We call them diseases, but in fact they are the cure of diseases.” German physician Samuel Hahnemann is considered the father of Homeopathy. German physician John H. Scheel termed “naturopathy” in 1895. Antoine Béchamp is considered the father of the Terrain Model. He accurately stated, “The primary cause of disease is in us, always in us.” His scientific research proved Hippocrates accurate. Before John Rockefeller created and marketed his oil-based “medicine” (that resulted in cancer), which eventually led to synthetic “medicine” (the drugs being pushed by most medical “doctors” today), most of America practiced Naturopathic medicine. Some practiced Allopathic medicine, such as blood-letting.

Unlike Allopathy, Naturopathy follows six (6) basic principles and uses whatever medical means they deem necessary to achieve these goals (such as massages, physical manipulation, reflexology, aromatherapy, herbal remedies, flower essences, nutritional counselling, etc., apart from synthetic drugs and their multiple negative side effects):

Primum Non Nocere (Do Not Harm): This is the philosophy of using non-invasive and the least toxic treatments they can.

Vis Medicatric Naturae (The Healing Power of Science): Like Homeopaths, Naturopathic doctors believe in the body’s ability to heal itself.

Tolle Causam (Identify and Treat the Cause): Also similar to Homeopathy, they find the underlying cause of the disease to address and remove it.

Docere (Doctor as Teacher): The heavy belief that you should educate your patients so they can take responsibility of their own body while treating their issues.

Tolle Totum (Treat the Whole Person): This is the holistic principle that recognizes the effect of lifestyle, family history, mental and emotional factors affect the patient.

Prevenic (Prevention): A strong emphasis on overall healthcare to prevent future disease.

Dr. Vernon Coleman has 12 laws of medicine that you would do well to understand. A good doctor should be familiar with these laws when dealing with patients. Patients should also be well aware of them.

Coleman’s 1st Law of Medicine: “If you are receiving treatment for an existing disease and you develop new symptoms, then, until proved otherwise, you should assume that the new symptoms are caused by the treatment you are receiving.

Coleman’s 2nd Law of Medicine: “There is no point in having tests done unless the results will affect your treatment.”
If your doctor wants you to have tests done, ask him how the results will affect your treatment. if the results of the tests won’t affect the treatment you receive (and aren’t needed as a baseline against which to compare future tests), then the tests aren’t worth having.
Tests and investigations are often regarded (by both doctors and patients) as being harmless. They aren’t. There is no such thing as minor surgery (Coleman’s 11th Law of Medicine), and even taking blood is an operation. There are dangers inherent in every test that is performed. And there is, in addition, the danger that the result will be wrong and that your doctors will treat the test rather than treating you.

Coleman’s 3rd Law of Medicine: “If the treatment doesn’t work, then you should consider the possibility that the diagnosis might be wrong. This is particularly true when several treatments have been tried.”

Coleman’s 4th Law of Medicine: “Screening examinations and check-ups are more profitable for doctors than for patients.”

Coleman’s 5th Law of Medicine: “It is doctors, not patients, who need annual check-ups.”
Along with cancer and circulatory disease, doctors are now one of the three most important causes of death and injury. Incompetent or careless doctors cause a horrifying amount of death or injury.

Coleman’s 6th Law of Medicine: “Hospitals are not suitable places for sick people. If you must go into one, you should get out as quickly as you can.”

Coleman’s 7th Law of Medicine: “There are fashions in medicine just as much as there are fashions in clothes. The difference is that whereas badly conceived fashions in clothes are only likely to embarrass you, ill-conceived fashions in medicine may kill you. The fashions in medicine have, by and large, as much scientific validity as the fashions in the clothes industry.”

Coleman’s 8th Law of Medicine: “The medical establishment will always take decisions on health matters which benefit industry, government and the medical profession, rather than patients. And the government will always take decisions on health matters which benefit the State rather than individual patients. What you read, hear or see about medicine and health matters will have more to do with the requirements of the pharmaceutical industry and the government, than the genuine needs of patients.”

Coleman’s 9th Law of Medicine: “Doctors and nurses know little or nothing about staying healthy. In particular, doctors and nurses know nothing useful about food, diet and healthy eating. (Sadly, the same is true of nutritionists and dieticians.)”

Coleman’s 10th Law of Medicine: “There are no holistic healers. There are only holistic patients.”
A truly holistic approach to staying healthy and treating illness depends upon using a wide range of possible remedies; treating the patient’s signs and symptoms (rather than his test results) and combining all types of alternative and orthodox medicine.

Coleman’s 11th Law of Medicine: “There is no such thing as minor surgery.”
Some operations are more complicated than others. Some take longer to perform. Some are more dangerous. All surgery should be taken seriously. It is never safe to describe surgery as ‘minor’.

Coleman’s 12th Law of Medicine: “Some patients will always be treated more equally than others.”
Today it is the elderly who are treated least equally.

YHWH Written On Human DNA

Yahweh (or Yahowah), the name of God, is written on the human DNA. The Tetragrammaton, YHWH, as God first identifies Himself to Moses (Ex. 3:14), corresponds to the numbers 10-5-6-5. “Coincidentally” (for those people unfamiliar with the law of large numbers) 10-5-6-5 is also the spacing of the base pairs in the human DNA.

This alone constitutes the basis for religious exemption of these toxic chemical cocktail bio-weapons falsely labeled as “vaccines”!

Former Moderna CEO Tal Zaks said, “We’re actually hacking the software of life.” For those with intelligence who not only have the cognitive capacity to understand those words but also have the ability to read between the lines (something the pathetic brainless hacks writing for so-called “fact checking” entities quite obviously lack), he absolutely did say that mRNA “vaccines” change your DNA. Only unintelligent clowns who lack the ability to read (or listen) and understand will attempt to deny this fact.

We are made in the image of God in more ways than one, and the enemy seeks to undermine and destroy this. The enemy frequently employs wicked men who also hate God to perform his bidding. Should it come as a surprise that they are trying to change man’s DNA to reflect something other than our Creator?

Onus and Evidence

“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” —Terry Allen
The onus is on those making the claims that viruses exist to prove they exist.

Atheists will attempt to take this quote and try to turn it around on Christians, saying the onus is on us to prove the existence of God. That is perfectly fine, as long as they can define up front what would constitute as evidence. However, there is a major problem with the atheist attempting this false “turning of the tables” (apart from the inability to actually read and understand what this quote says and means): the existence of God is not asserted without evidence.

Quite frankly, most atheists are clowns who will refuse to accept any type of evidence. They claim they want evidence, fail to define what would constitute as evidence, and then no matter what kind of evidence you produce, they reject it. They should learn to be honest with themselves and just say that no matter what sort of evidence we provide, they will never accept it.

Nevertheless, they must define up front what will constitute as evidence, and then when evidence is presented that fulfills that criterion, they have no course but to accept it. That is, if they possess the least character, integrity, and honesty.

Realistically, the onus is actually on the atheist to prove God does not exist considering the abundance of evidence they must willfully reject in order to arrive at their belief, such as the entire creation itself. Trying to convince the see-no-evidence-hear-no-evidence atheist is an exercise in futility. You might as well be beating a dead horse and expecting it to magically get up and win a race for you. Do not cast your pearls before swine. Washed pigs return to wallowing in the mud and dogs return to their vomit.

Daily Gaslighting Practices

The idea that you need to hold a particular title or position or that you need a degree in something in order to understand it is FALSE; it simply is not true. It is a fallacy and it is gaslighting. You do not need to be an “authority,” an “expert,” a “theologian,” or a “scholar.” (What even determines whether you are an “authority,” an “expert,” a “theologian,” or a “scholar,” since different groups have their own and they are not in agreement? What determines who is right?) It does not matter if you have a degree in rocket science or shovelling manure; if you can read and understand, then you are qualified to speak on it, providing you have actually done your homework and researched the subject thoroughly before you attempt to speak on it. Otherwise you are a mere fool who talks for the sake of hearing your own voice.

Atheists are typical of this. They want to gaslight you on what is or is not science (something they clearly do not understand themselves), what does or does not constitute as medicine, as well as all their other bogus beliefs, but when it comes to religion they are each somehow self-appointed “experts” who have never researched it honestly and do not have the slightest clue what they are talking about. They read/heard someone say something they blindly agree with and then they ignorantly parrot it as if having any kind of force of validity. It sounded good to them, so they repeat it. Even though the argument can be easily refuted ten different ways, they stand by it and repeat it no matter how many times you dismantle and obliterate it. They keep beating their favourite dead horses expecting them to magically get up and win them the race.

The key here is having the ability to read and to understand, which most of these people do not have. First, they have no interest in reading the Bible, let alone seeking to understand it. “If [you] never look to see what it says, [you] can’t test to see if it’s true or even take the exam.” Second, what little they do read they fail to understand. Or they talk to some clown who refers to him/herself as a “Christian,” but does not know the first thing about Christianity or the Bible and has several wacky beliefs, and ass-u-me that is what biblical Christianity is. It is easy to refute your own self-erected straw men.

STOP listening to so-called “experts” and “authorities”! Find out for yourself. THINK for yourself! Professor Richard Feynman has some excellent words for you to heed:

“Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”

“Since then I never pay attention to anything by ‘experts.’ I calculate everything myself.”

“Don’t pay attention to ‘authorities,’ think for yourself.”

“Have no respect whatsoever for authority; forget who said it and instead look what he starts with, where he ends up, and ask yourself, ‘Is it reasonable?’”

“SCIENCE:
If you don’t make mistakes, you’re doing it wrong.
If you don’t correct those mistakes, you’re really doing it wrong.
If you can’t accept you’re mistaken, you’re not doing it at all.”

“Modern education:
Creating people who are smart enough to accurately repeat what they are told and follow the orders.
And dumb enough to think this makes them smarter than everyone else.”

“The real problem with the education system is that it tests memorization skills, not learning or intelligence.
The two major aspects that lack in modern education systems are education and system.”

“The problem is not people being uneducated.
The problem is that people are educated just enough to believe what they have been taught, and not educated enough to question anything from what they have been taught.”

“When your ‘education’ limits your imagination it’s called indoctrination. Those who cannot think for themselves are truly lost.
Education should be a rewarding experience which allows you to think, imagine, question, doubt and solve problems.”

“Education isn’t about the ability to remember and repeat, in which people study to pass exams, and teach others to pass exams, but nobody knows anything.
It is the ability to learn from experience, to think, solve problems, and use our knowledge to adapt to new situations.”

“You cannot get educated by this self-propagating system in which people study to pass exams, and teach others to pass exams, but nobody knows anything.
You learn something by doing it yourself, by asking questions, by thinking, and by experimenting.”

“The goal of teaching should not be to help the students learn how to memorize and spit out information under academic pressure.
The purpose of teaching is to inspire the desire for learning in them and make them able to think, understand, and question.”

“Never confuse education with intelligence. You can have a Ph.D. and still be an idiot.”

“When you are dead, you don’t know you are dead. It’s pain only for others.
It’s the same thing when you are stupid.”

“Be careful when you follow the masses. Sometimes the M is silent.”

By the way, according to the Noah Webster American Dictionary of the English Language, a "scholar" is nothing more than "One who learns of a teacher; one who is under the tuition of a preceptor; a pupil; a disciple; hence, any member of a college, academy or school; applicable to the learner of any art, science or branch of literature." A "scholar" is not, as people tend to use the term today, an "expert" of some kind. So when ignorant people talk about "our scholars say/teach such and such," they are really saying, "our students say/teach such and such." Since when do we listen to students? Should you not be saying "our doctors say/teach such and such," since "doctor" used to mean "teacher"?

When some ignorant clowns says, "the scholars say this," make sure that you laugh directly in his/her face because he/she clearly does not know what they are talking about, and they are desperately reaching in an attempt to be right and make you wrong. This is no different than that child who always used to know someone in their family who just happened to do that particular thing that proves you are wrong and support his/her ridiculously asinine lies.

FACTS About “Vaccines”

“Vaccine science is junk science!”

A common question: “If there is no such thing as an infectious virus, then why did diseases decline and/or vaccines eradicate these diseases?”

The answer is simple:

1. Vaccines never eradicated anything and an unbiased review of the evidence demonstrates vaccines do not work at all, unless harming people and making a lot of money for pharmaceutical companies is the goal.
    
2. Disease declined because of improvement in the HUMAN TERRAIN.

FACT: Vaccines are not responsible for the reduction of illnesses; changes in living conditions are: Cleaner drinking water, fresher foods, better nutritional information, less crowding of living spaces, sanitation removal, plumbing, etc. Even the CDC’s own data attributes all these declines to clean water systems and sanitation—not “vaccines.”

FACT: Prevalent diseases in the early 1900s — including Cholera, Scarlet Fever, Tuberculosis, and Typhoid — even declined without ever having a vaccine or vaccine program.

FACT: Vaccines are responsible for numerous illnesses and disorders of the blood, brain, nervous system, and skin; including cancer. Just look at the increase of such ever since the onset of mass vaccination from 1950 onward. This is not a “coincidence”!

Here are several historical events exposing the dangers of so-called “vaccination”:

“The 19th-century population shift from country to city that accompanied industrialization and immigration led to overcrowding in newly populated cities that lacked proper sanitation or clean water systems. These conditions resulted in repeated outbreaks of cholera, dysentery, TB, typhoid fever, influenza, yellow fever, and malaria.
By 1900, however, the incidence of many of these diseases had begun to decline because of public health improvements, implementation of which continued into the 20th century. Sanitation & Hygiene.
Local, state, and federal efforts to improve sanitation and hygiene reinforced the concept of collective ‘public health’ action (e.g. to prevent infection by providing clean drinking water). By 1900, 40 of the 45 states had established health departments. The first county health departments were established in 1908.
From the 1930s through the 1950s, state and local health departments made substantial progress in disease prevention activities, including sewage disposal, water treatment, food safety, organized solid waste disposal, and public education about hygienic practices (e.g. food handling and handwashing).”
https://learntherisk.org/vaccines/diseases/

1871-1872 England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox outbreak with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. —The Hadwen Documents

In Germany, compulsory mass vaccination against diphtheria commenced in 1940 and by 1945 diphtheria cases were up from 40,000 to 250,000. —Hannah Allen, Don't Get Stuck!

In the USA in 1960, two virologists discovered that both polio vaccines were contaminated with the SV 40 virus which causes cancer in animals as well as changes in human cell tissue cultures. Millions of children have been injected with these vaccines. —Med Journal of Australia 3/17/1973 p.555

In 1967, Ghana was declared measles free by the World Health Organization after 96% of its population was vaccinated. In 1972, Ghana experienced one of its worst measles outbreaks with its highest ever mortality rate. —Dr. H. Albonico, MMR Vaccine Campaign in Switzerland, 1990

In the UK between 1970 and 1990, over 200,000 cases of whooping cough occurred in fully vaccinated children. —Community Disease Surveillance Centre, UK

In the 1970’s a tuberculosis vaccine trial in India involving 260,000 people revealed that more cases of TB occurred in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. —The Lancet 12/1/80 p.73

In 1975 it took only 2 deaths of Japanese children following inoculations using the American DPT vaccine to ban its use there forever. —Vaccine Roulette, 1993

In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk, who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. —Science 4/4/77 “Abstracts”

In 1978, a survey of 30 States in the US revealed that more than half of the children who contracted measles had been adequately vaccinated. —The People's Doctor Dr. Robert Mendelsohn

In 1979, Sweden abandoned the whooping cough vaccine due to its ineffectiveness. Out of 5,140 cases in 1978, it was found that 84% had been vaccinated three times. —BMJ 283:696-697, 1981

"Scientific medicine has taken credit it does not deserve for some advances in health. Most people believe that victory over the infectious diseases of the last century came with the invention of immunizations. In fact, cholera, typhoid, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough, etc., were in decline before vaccines for them became available - the result of better methods of sanitation, sewage disposal, and distribution of food and water." —Dr. Andrew Weil, Health and Healing

Here are several quotes pertaining to the dangers of so-called “vaccinations”:

“No batch of vaccine can be proven safe before it is given to children.” —Surgeon General, Leonard Sheele, MD (1955)

“The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.” —James Shannon, MD of the NIH (National Institutes of Health) (1967)

“The chances of getting Alzheimer’s disease is ten times higher if an individual has had five consecutive flu shots between 1970 and 1980, than if they just had one, two or none.” —Hugh Fudenberg, MD (1997)

“In regions in which there is no organized vaccination of the population, general paralysis [to polio] is rare. It is impossible to deny a connection between vaccination and the encephalitis [brain damage] which follows it.” —Journal of the American Medical Association (1926)
It is worth noting that Jonas Salk, national hero and creator of the famous “Salk” polio vaccine, made a public statement in 1976 that two thirds of the cases of polio which occurred between 1966 and 1976 were caused by his vaccine.

“I am against mandating compulsory vaccination laws, because I have met no one in government who has the wisdom to mandate to another person what that person should do with his child. I have sat in government some 30 years and I can tell you, that when I sat in the halls of those persons concerned with setting policies for vaccination procedures in this country, that I was never impressed there was a great depository of wisdom in that room. There just wasn’t. I believe that the person who is far more capable for determining what happens to a child is the parent of that child, rather than some bureaucrat who sits around a table in Washington . . . . when I left the FDA in 1976, there was no technique available to measure reliably and consistently neurotoxicity or potency of the vaccines then in use. Today, 11 years later the situation remains essentially the same.” —J. Anthony Morris, PhD of the FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) (1987)

“. . . vaccine is the cause of more diseases and sufferings than anything I can name. Such diseases as cancer, syphilis, cold sores, and many other disease conditions are the direct result of vaccination. Yet, in the state of Virginia and many other states parents are compelled to submit their children to this procedure while the medical profession not only receives its pay for this service, but also makes splendid and prospective clients for the future . . .” —H. Mullen, Murder by Injection

“There has never been a single vaccine in this country [the USA] that has ever been submitted to a controlled scientific study. They never took a group of 100 people who were candidates for a vaccine, gave 50 of them a vaccine and left the other 50 alone to measure the outcome. And since that hasn’t been done, that means if you want to be kind, you will call vaccines an unproven remedy. If you want to be accurate, you’ll call people who give vaccines ‘quacks.’” —Robert Mendelsohn, MD

“The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination is a disaster to the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illnesses and brain damage. We are changing our genetic code through vaccination.” —Guylaine Lanctot, MD, Medical Mafia

“I found that the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics you will realize that this is not so.” —Archie Kalokerinos, MD

“There is a great deal of evidence to prove that vaccinations of children does far more harm than good.” —J. Anthony Morris, PhD
He was fired the day after he made this public statement in the early 1970s. He later fought and got his job back just in time to be a major critic of then Gerald Ford’s swine flu vaccination campaign, which killed thousands of people. For doing this, he again lost his job.
In 1976, there was a Swine Flu scare. Fearing it might rival the 1918 "flu outbreak," President Gerald Ford swung into action with a wide-scale vaccination plan, vowing to vaccinate "every man, woman, and child in the United States." He launched a full-scale PR campaign with celebrities and government officials doing photo ops at their vaccination appointment.
Approximately 25% of the American public rushed out to get vaccinated. That's when problems began to arise. Many of those who had gotten vaccinated were getting sick, sicker than the people who caught the actual Swine Flu. It was clear that the vaccine was doing more harm than the disease itself.
Only two (2) people had to die in order to trigger the creation of Ford's program. Both people were from the same military base. One of them already had existing underlying medical conditions. More than 450 young people were diagnosed with Guillain-Barre Syndrome after having been vaccinated.

Reading from the Physicians Desk Reference and the organic consumer reports regarding vaccines:

“. . . . injections of foreign substances like viruses, toxins and foreign proteins into the blood stream by a vaccination have been associated with diseases and disorders of the blood, brain, nervous system and skin. Rare diseases like atypical measles and monkey fever, as well as well known disorders, such as premature aging, and allergies have been associated with vaccines. Also linked to immunization are such well known diseases as cancer, leukemia, paralysis, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, and sudden infant death syndrome . . .”

That says it all right there! Yet what do they do? Inject their toxic chemical cocktail soups into the bloodstream. Why would anyone subject themselves to this level of extreme risk unless they had a death wish?
America is the most vaccinated nation in the world; it is also the sickest nation in the world. The W.H.O. records something like 30 nations that are more healthy than America. The correlation should come as no surprise.

“Crib death [SIDS, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome] was so infrequent in pre-vaccination eras that it was not even mentioned in statistics. It only started to increase in the 1950s with mass vaccination.” —Harris Coulter, PhD

“. . . the chief, if not sole cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccinations . . .” —Dr. Robert Bell, Cancer Specialist of the British Medical Hospital, President of the Medical Association for the Reduction and Prevention of Cancer, Vice President of the International Society of Cancer Research, member of the American Society of Progressive Physicians

“. . . two well known causes of cancer are 1. Nicotine, and 2. Vaccinations. Vaccines are certainly the most prolific cause of internal and external cancer. The vaccine virus poisons the lymphatic system, impairs it’s function and lays the foundation for internal cancer, from which there has not been any successful medical treatment to date . . .” —Dr. K. Morrison (1984)

“. . . I have been a regular practitioner of medicine in Boston for 33 years. I have studied the question of vaccinations conscientiously for 45 years. As for vaccinations as a preventative of disease, there is not a scrap of evidence in its favour. Injection of virus into the pure blood stream of the people does not prevent disease. Rather, it tends to increase epidemic and make the disease it is attempting to annihilate more deadly. Of this we have indisputable proof. In America, cancer mortality has increased from 9 cases per 100,000 to 80 cases per 100,000, or a 900% increase over the last 50 years. No conceivable thing could have caused this but the universal blood poisoning now existing in the form of vaccinations . . .” —Dr. Charles E. Paser
Is it not interesting that you will be hard pressed to find a case of cancer in any unvaccinated person, especially children? By the time children in America reach the age of 14, they receive anywhere from 20 to 30 separate vaccinations. The American Cancer Society tells us that the leading killer disease in children before the age of 14 is cancer. This is not a coincidence!

“It is pathetic and ludicrous to say we ever vanquished smallpox with vaccines, when only 10% of the population was ever vaccinated.” —Glen Dettman, MD

“One of the best ways to ensure your child’s health is to allow them to get sick. At first, hearing this concept may sound outrageous. Yet, childhood illnesses, such as measles, mumps, and even whooping cough, may be of benefit to a child’s developing immune system, and it is inadvisable to suppress these illnesses with vaccines. Evidence is also accumulating that routine childhood vaccinations may directly contribute to the emergence of chronic problems such as eczema, ear infections, asthma, and bowel inflammations.” —Philip Incao, MD

“Vaccination subverts the immune system’s natural response; the ability to clear that virus. The rash is the body’s eradication of the virus. If you do not have a typical measles rash you are not invoking an adequate cellular immune response. Measles may persist in the body then. Children who do not develop the rash have an excess risk of delayed mortality.” —Andrew Wakefield, MD

“There is no need to protect children from contracting infectious diseases of childhood. These diseases are there to prime and mature their immune system. Chronic ill-health, colds, otitis media, and upper and lower respiratory tract diseases are well-documented in vaccinated children. A well nourished child will go through rubella, whooping cough, chicken pox and all the rest with flying colors.” —V. Scheibner: Immunization: The Medical Assault on the Immune System

“Our children face the possibility of death or serious long term adverse effects from mandated vaccination programs that aren’t necessary, or that have very limited benefits.” —Jane Orient, MD

“There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass vaccination programs can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease. I urge you to reject all vaccinations for your child.” —Robert Mendelsohn, MD

"The efforts of the medical profession in the United States to control the treatment of human ailments is not due to its love of humanity. It is due to its love of its job, which it proposes to monopolize. It has been carrying on a vigorous campaign all over the country against new methods of schools of healing, because it wants [all] the business, and insists that nobody shall live or die without its services. Whether it cures more or fewer people than schools which do not use medicines, or whether it cures anybody at all, are debatable questions which I shall not attempt to discuss. I stand for everybody's right to regulate their own life, so long as it doesn't infringe on other peoples' rights to do the same. If a man wants to live or die without the aid of the medical profession, he should be permitted to do so. If he hasn't this right, it is pretty hard to tell what right he should have.
Now I would have no argument with the medical profession if they would leave me alone. I am willing that they should advertise their wares, but I object to being forced to patronize them. They have specifics [vaccines] to prevent one from catching almost every disease, yet not one of them can explain how the prevention is brought about. Nor can he prove that it does prevent. They are not content to vaccinate [only] those who apply to them, but they ask the State to compel everyone to be vaccinated. I might as well ask the State to compel everyone to hire me to try their law cases. Sometime, if they keep on, and they will keep on if the people give them the chance, they will be able to vaccinate us for everything, and we shall be compelled to submit. I have watched this medical profession for a long time, and it bears watching, and I know that there is not a single thing effecting human life that they will not lay their hands on if we give them the chance." —Clarence Darrow (concerning the medical cartel in the 1930s), defending lawyer in the Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925

"Had it not been for the mass selling of vaccines, Pasteur's germ theory of disease would have collapsed into obscurity." —E. Douglas Hume

"In 1915, another medical doctor wrote an article for the top British medical journal Lancet. Dr. Montais studied 21 cases of tetanus, each of whom had received Pasteurian inoculation. The conclusion of the article, which appeared in the 23 Oct 1915 issue, was that in every case, the tetanus had been caused by the inoculation. Dr. Montais said that "Pasteur had created a new form of disease." " —Tim O'Shea, The Post-Antibiotic Age: Germ Theory

“Vaccination does not account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the century...nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among us children occurred before 1940, when few antibiotics or vaccines were available.” —Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: Trends In the Health of Americans During the 20th Century, Journal of American Academy of Pediatrics, December 2000

The pharmaceutical industry ran an impressive brainwashing propaganda campaign to convince the entire world that so-called “vaccines” saved us, but as you can see (providing you possess the capability to read and understand), that was all a big fat LIE! All this information is not the only information out there that exposes “vaccination” as the complete fraud and scam that it is. For example, Professor Alfred Russell Wallace in his book The Wonderful Century proved that people who were “vaccinated” against Smallpox actually had a significantly higher death rate from Smallpox than those who had never been “vaccinated.” He concluded:

It is thus completely demonstrated that all the statements by which the public has been gulled for so many years as to the almost complete immunity of the revaccinated Army and Navy are absolutely false. It is all what the Americans call “bluff.” There is no immunity. They have no protection. When exposed to infection they do suffer just as much as other populations or even more. In the whole of the nineteen years 1878-1896 inclusive, unvaccinated Leicester had so few smallpox deaths that the Registrar-General presents the average by the decimal 0.01 per thousand population equal to ten per million, whereas during 1876-1889, there was less than one death per annum. Here we have real immunity, real protection; and it is obtained by attending to sanitation and isolation, coupled with the almost total neglect of vaccination. Neither Army nor Navy can show any such results as this?

“Protection” via “vaccination” is an ugly superstition that must be discarded! For so-called “modern” medicine, it sure has a lot of catching up to do, being over 2000 years lagging behind the actual facts:

“Diseases of any kind are crises of purification, of toxic elimination. Symptoms are the natural defenses of the body. We call them diseases, but in fact they are the cure of diseases.” —Hippocrates (c. 460 - c. 370 BC), father of medicine

“The primary cause of disease is in us, always in us.” —Antoine Béchamp (1816 - 1908)

FACTS About “Viruses”

Pellagra was labeled a “contagious disease” until they found out it was a nutritional deficiency. Most “diseases” are often the result of a vitamin deficiency (as seen above). Typhoid, Cholera, Yellow Fever, and other “infectious diseases” disappeared when people were provided clean water and sanitation. Most “diseases,” including Measles, were the cause of poverty, malnutrition, crowded living conditions, and generally poor health. As soon as living conditions were improved (cleaner drinking water, fresher foods, better nutritional information, less crowding of living spaces, sanitation removal, plumbing, etc.), these “diseases” began to decline. Polio was/is associated with DDT and other toxins. Toxins and poisons and deficiencies are more frequently the cause of what people call “viruses,” which aligns more scientifically with the Terrain Model.

“Diseases of any kind are crises of purification, of toxic elimination. Symptoms are the natural defenses of the body. We call them diseases, but in fact they are the cure of diseases.” —Hippocrates (c. 460 - c. 370 BC), father of medicine

“The primary cause of disease is in us, always in us.” —Antoine Béchamp

“If virulent [hostile] germs were normal in the atmosphere, how numerous would be the occasions for their penetration independently by way of the lungs and intestinal mucus! There would not be a wound, however slight, the prick even of a pin, that would not be the occasion for infecting us with smallpox, typhus, syphilis, gonorrhoea.” —Antoine Béchamp

“If the ‘germ theory of disease’ were correct, there’d be no one living to believe it.” —B. J. Palmer

“What the medical cartel calls disease is nothing more than a natural process of toxic elimination.” —Dr. William P. Trebing

“One of the best ways to ensure your child’s health is to allow them to get sick. At first, hearing this concept may sound outrageous. Yet, childhood illnesses, such as measles, mumps, and even whooping cough, may be of benefit to a child’s developing immune system, and it is inadvisable to suppress these illnesses with vaccines. Evidence is also accumulating that routine childhood vaccinations may directly contribute to the emergence of chronic problems such as eczema, ear infections, asthma, and bowel inflammations.” —Philip Incao, MD

“Contracting and overcoming childhood diseases are a part of a developmental process that actually helps develop a healthy, robust, adult immune system able to meet the challenges that inevitable encounters with viruses and bacteria will present later on.” —Harris Coulter, PhD

"Medical doctors are working on the germ theory of disease... But the germ theory is already weakening and is due for being thrown aside. Dr. Fraser of Canada and Dr. Powell of California have experimented with billions of germs of all varieties, but they have been unable to produce a single disease by the introduction of germs into human subjects. Dr. Waite tried for years to prove the germ theory, but he could not do so. During the World War an experiment was conducted at Gallop's Island Massachusetts, in which millions of influenza germs were injected into over one hundred men at the Government hospital, and no one got the flu. Germs are scavengers." —E. W. Cordingley, M.D., N.D., A.M., Principles and Practice of Naturopathy

"We said before that so-called 'germs' are ubiquitous. They are ever present, in many varying forms in both healthy and sick people. These microbes kick into what modern scientists call 'pathogens,' when the media is toxic and conducive to clean up. When you enter into a healing crisis, and your body is throwing off toxins, these 'germs' appear out of your very substance, to help eliminate, process and break down these toxins. Germs have absolutely no causal relationship to disease. But germs do appear to help you clean out, because put quite simply, your disease is your cure!" —Dr. William P. Trebing, Good-Bye Germ Theory, p.154

"... Viruses are simply the excretions of a toxic cell. Viruses are pieces of DNA or RNA, with a few other proteins. They butt out from the cell. They happen when the cell is poisoned. They are not the cause of anything." —Thomas Cowan, M.D. on Rudolf Steiner's insights.

"The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of the unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infections and contagious disorders are caused by germs." —M. L. Leverson, M.D

"Three criteria are, according to the scientific method, needed to properly identify a virus. It must be isolated from a host cell. As of 2016 this has never been accomplished in humans. It must be photographed and its diameter measured. As of 2016 this has never been accomplished in humans. It must be biochemically characterized. As of 2016 this has never been accomplished in humans. This has never been done with any virus (herpes, hepatitis, H1N1, bird flu, swine flu, influenza, polio, measles) let alone HIV, HPV, SARS, Zika or Ebola. The colorful photographs seen online are CGG's (computer generated graphics) – meaning they are 'interpretations.'" —Dr. Neal Smookler, "How Much is that Dogma in the Window?" New Medicine Online

"We agree with those members of the profession who hold that no germ causes tuberculosis. Germs do not cause any disease. Further, we agree that there is more harm in the fear of germs than there is in the germs themselves." —Simon Louis Katzoff, M.D., Timely Truths on Human Health, 1921

"The general public have been told that we do not become ill except when germs penetrate into from without. The germ theory of disease is ridiculous." —E. Douglas Hume, Bechamp or Pasteur: A lost chapter in the History of Biology

"You're working under a wrong premise to begin with and you're never going to find the answer if you do that. Viruses have no nucleus. There's no respiratory system. There's no circulatory system. There's no digestive system. Viruses are not alive. That's like saying soap is alive. They're not alive. They are solvents. They are soaps. However, more accurately, they are enzymes to fractionate tissue for waste elimination." —Aajonus Vonderplanitz

"We must infer that at least some and probably all three of those Russian peasants died because of Pasteur's vaccine, as did uncounted people later on....Only one thing is sure: ever since Pasteur developed his "vaccine," the cases of death from rabies have increased, not diminished." —Hans Ruesch

"In 1915, another medical doctor wrote an article for the top British medical journal Lancet. Dr. Montais studied 21 cases of tetanus, each of whom had received Pasteurian inoculation. The conclusion of the article, which appeared in the 23 Oct 1915 issue, was that in every case, the tetanus had been caused by the inoculation. Dr. Montais said that "Pasteur had created a new form of disease." " —Tim O'Shea, The Post-Antibiotic Age: Germ Theory

"The culprit however, is not the microbe. It is the level of toxicity you have in your own blood stream." —Dr. William P. Trebing, Good-Bye Germ Theory

"In all that I have witnessed inside and outside of laboratories, there is only one cause of disease: Industrial pollution in medication, food, air, soil and water. Strengthening a body's constitution and lymphatic system is the first step to reversing/curing disease" —Aajonus Vonderplantiz

"Germs cannot be the cause of disease, because disease germs are also found in healthy bodies." —H. Lindlahr, M.D., Nature Cure

"What’s happening is, like I said, we have colds, which are mainly bacterial, which go feed on toxic tissue that's been damaged – we don't eat well enough, we don't eat all raw and therefore we accumulate toxicity. So bacteria have to come in and eat that waste product because we can't keep up with all the waste. OK. So that’s what a cold is. Flu is mainly viral. Some bacteria may be active during flu. Some areas of our bodies may not be so contaminated that bacteria - the natural way that we cleanse with bacteria when we're overloaded with toxicity or waste products, will help us. But when we are so toxic that the bacteria are poisoned by the tissue, from chemical inundation, then we have to make solvents. Each cell makes a solvent. Each cell makes a soap to help clean itself. And it's a union. It's like a factory. All the particular cells get together and say, "Let's make this to help clean ourselves." So they make enzymes which we will call soap to do that. So there’s nothing dormant about it. It's just that when the accumulation of industrially contaminated waste is so great and you can't use microbes then the cells make solvents, that is, viruses we call flu." —Aajonus Vonderplanitz

"Any kind of flu is the same thing. When the climate and temperature are right, certain tissues will cleanse. They may have a 7-years cycle. They may have a 6-months cycle. It depends upon the tissue and how contaminated it is. If certain tissue needs to cleanse every two years, our bodies will create, if waste tissue is too toxic for mircrobes, our bodies will create a solvent (a virus) that fractionates and cleanses that particular tissue every two years, every 6 months, every 3 months, every 7 years, every 12 years, depending upon that tissue and how contaminated it is. The myth that herpes is contagious is pharmaceutical industry fiction to scare you into taking medication." —Aajonus Vonderplanitz

"Rudolph Virchow, a great German scientist, repudiated the germ theory of disease. He said that disease brought on germs rather than the germs caused disease. Claude Bernard, Bechamp and Tissot - great French scientists - all disproved the germ theory of disease. In Hans Selye's book Stress of Life (Page 205), an account is recorded that Louis Pasteur, inventor of the germ theory of disease, admitted he was wrong. Sanitation is the only factor that has reduced the spread of the old-time scourges. If the germ theory were founded on facts, there would be no living being to read what is here in written, for germs are ubiquitous - they exist everywhere. In many diseases supposedly caused by a specific germ, that germ is not present. Contrariwise, specific germs said to cause a specific disease are present in huge proportions without the specific disease manifesting itself." —Dr. Bernarr, D.C., D.D.

“...inventing the risk of a disastrous epidemic, incriminating an elusive pathogen, ignoring alternative toxic causes, manipulating epidemiology with non-verifiable numbers to maximize the false perception of an imminent catastrophe, and promising salvation with vaccines. This guarantees large financial returns. But how is it possible to achieve all of this? Simply by relying on the most powerful activator of human decision-making process—FEAR!” —Torsten Engelbrecht and Clays Kohlein, Virus Mania

This is not all that can be said about “viruses,” which they have misidentified and mischaracterized.

You cannot “catch” a virus! You cannot “catch” anything from someone else breathing, coughing, or sneezing on you or in your direction! No virus has ever been isolated, purified, and characterized, and proven to cause disease, let alone spread from person to person. None! Go ahead and send a FOI (Freedom of Information) request to any Public Health institution and ask them for any and all records of evidence-based scientific data that demonstrates unequivocally that they have isolated/purified any of the viruses. The response you will receive is that they “could find no such records.”

Two doctors, Dr. Fraser of Canada and Dr. Powell of California, experimented with billions of germs of all varieties, but they have never been able to produce a single disease in anyone when introducing the germs by natural means into human subjects.

Dr. Waite tried for years to prove “germ theory,” but had zero success.

“Of all germ-distributors, the most notorious was Dr Arthur W. Waite, who, in the year 1916, was an embarrassment to medical science. In his bacteriological laboratory, he had billions of germs. Waite planned to kill his father-in-law, John E. Peck, ‪435 Riverside Drive, New York‬ City. He fed the old man germs of Diptheria, but got no results. He induced Peck to use a nasal spray, in which he had planted colonies of the germs of tuberculosis. Not a cough. He fed the old man calomel, to weaken his resistance. He turned loose hordes of germs of typhoid, and then influenza. In desperation, he lost all standing in the annals of distinctive crimes, and went common, or used arsenic. The old-fashioned method was a success. One’s impression is that, if anything, diets and inhalations of germs may be healthful.” —Charles Fort

Even Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch could not find evidence of contagion using his four postulates. Interestingly enough, he abandoned his first postulate when he discovered carriers of cholera and typhoid fever who did not get sick. Bacteriologists and virologists today believe his postulates have been recognized as largely obsolete by epidemiologists since the 1950s.

Thomas Rivers dropped Koch’s first postulate and modified the remainder of postulates in order to determine the infectiousness of viruses. Unfortunately, researchers still cannot prove a specific virus causes a specific illness or disease using Rivers’ postulates.

No disease attributed to bacteria or “viruses” has ever met all of Koch’s or Rivers’ postulates. These do not cause disease! (Not in the way that Germ Theory postulates, anyway.)

“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” —Terry Allen
The onus is on those making the claims that viruses exist to prove they exist.

FACT: No one in the entire world has ever isolated, purified, or characterized any “virus,” thereby proving its existence!

FACT: Neither Koch’s postulates nor Rivers’ postulates, which are completely logical, have ever been completely met in order to prove “contagion” from either bacteria, germs, or “viruses”!

FACT: No bacteria, germ, or “virus” has ever been demonstrated and proven, using the scientific method, to be “contagious” and spread from person to person!

FACT: “Viruses” have been misidentified and mischaracterized. What they are identifying as “viruses” are merely dead cell debris eaters.

FACT: All the images and animations they show us are just that; they have never been witnessed using any kind of microscope, which is what the scientific method requires.

As soon as people come to grips with reality and accept these facts, instead of impaling them on their blind convictions of established dogma, the better humanity will be for it.

If and when a bacterium appears, it is not because someone “caught” it. It is because the cells in our body use the bacteria to cleanse out the toxicity that we have either ingested or inhaled. This can be observed from the pleomorphic nature of bacteria in how they change shape according to their environment, as amply demonstrated from the work of Pierre Jacques Antoine Béchamp (1816-1908). The presence of a microbe does not mean it is the cause of disease; rather, it is a symptom of disease.

“Germ Theory” is simply untrue. We are being repeatedly poisoned and it is all based on complete deception and fabrication. The Terrain is everything!

Here is how the superstition of modern “medicine” using smoke and mirrors actually works:

“We have never isolated, purified, or characterized a single ‘virus,’ or proven that one is the actual cause of any disease. So, you will just have to trust us that they exist and are ‘contagious.’”

“We know that the ‘virus’ infects and kills humans even though we have never tested the ‘virus’ on humans because that would be unethical. Therefore, we do our testing on animals, even though when we test animals they do not get sick, because they are not proper ‘hosts’ for the ‘virus.’ So, you will just have to trust us.”

FACTS About AIDS and “HIV”

Every doctor and nurse used to be told that if you wanted to know if a patient was immune to a particular “viral” disease, you test their antibody levels. If they were high, that meant they were immune.

Enter 1984. (No, not George Orwell’s book.) Robert Gallo announces that they had found the cause of AIDS, a “virus” they called HIV. The reason they “knew” it caused AIDS? Because they found elevated antibody levels in some (not all) patients. Doctors and nurses were now being told that antibodies meant the “virus” was actually causing the disease.

Wait a second! Who changed the rules?

For the record, AIDS is not even a new disease. It is the same disease as the condition caused by immune-suppressive drugs used to prevent people from rejecting organs after a transplant. The new part of AIDS, Kaposi’s sarcoma, was linked to the use of “poppers” (alkyl nitrite drugs), used to relax the sphincter and facilitate anal intercourse.

In spite of 40 years of research, no one has isolated the so-called “HIV virus” from anyone suffering from AIDS. It does not exist! In fact, no one has ever documented transmission of “HIV.”

December 7th 1994 Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel, Greensboro, N.C., Dr Willner (a medical doctor of 40 years experience) an outspoken whistleblower of the AIDS hoax.
In front of a gathering of about 30 alternative-medicine practitioners and several journalists, Willner stuck a needle in the finger of Andres, 27, a Fort Lauderdale student who says he has tested positive for HIV. Then, wincing, the 65-year-old doctor stuck himself. In 1993, Dr. Willner stunned Spain by inoculating himself with the blood of Pedro Tocino, an HIV positive hemophiliac. This demonstration of devotion to the truth and the Hippocratic Oath he took, nearly 40 years before, was reported on the front page of every major newspaper in Spain. His appearance on Spain’s most popular television show invoked a 4 to 1 response by the viewing audience in favor of his position against the “AIDS hypothesis.” When asked why he would put his life on the line to make a point, Dr. Willner replied: “I do this to put a lo stop to the greatest murderous fraud in medical history. By injecting myself with HIV positive blood, I am proving the point as Dr. Walter Reed did to prove the truth about Yellow Fever. In this way it is my hope to expose the truth about HIV in the interest of all mankind.” He tested negative multiple times. He died of a heart attack 4 months later, 15th April 1995.

There were people who diagnosed as having “HIV” who never developed AIDS, and there were people with AIDS who never diagnosed as having “HIV.” Regarding “testing,” the creator of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technique, Kary Mullis, said, “PCR . . . is just a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That’s what it is. It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that.” It could not detect “HIV” then any more than it can detect “COVID” now (which would actually be SARS-CoV-2, because you cannot test for symptoms, which is what “COVID” is—SARS-CoV-2 is the “virus” that supposedly causes “COVID,” and you cannot test for causes).

“HIV” was as much of a scam as “COVID” was. If you do not know anything about the drug AZT, go look it up. It was a homosexual’s worst nightmare. Multiple people who tested “positive” for “HIV” and were given AZT ended up getting AIDS, and those who had AIDS and were given AZT ended up dying.

FACTS About Smallpox

“It is pathetic and ludicrous to say we ever vanquished smallpox with vaccines, when only 10% of the population was ever vaccinated.” —Glen Dettman, MD

The so-called Smallpox “vaccine” was the first “vaccine” to be developed in the late 1700s. The lying Medical and Pharmaceutical industries claim that Smallpox was eradicated in the late 20th century due to “vaccines.” Let us get one thing straight—nothing has ever been eradicated by so-called “vaccines.” Nothing!!!

The ignorant lying clowns at Medical News Today claim, “There was no treatment for smallpox before the creation of vaccines. Doctors gave people supportive care to help them manage the symptoms, but that was all they could do. Smallpox vaccines prevented people from getting smallpox, but they were not a cure for existing cases. Only with widespread immunization did the disease begin to die out around the world.” [Emphasis mine.]

This is absolutely laughable. While this ridiculous nonsense is believed by most of the Medical and Pharmaceutical industries, recorded history bears a different story, as you can see:

1871-1872 England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox outbreak with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. —The Hadwen Documents

Does this account sound like “vaccines [preventing] people from getting smallpox”? Quite the opposite!

How about the study by Dr. Adolf Vogt, professor of Hygiene and Sanitory Statistics at the University of Berne, Switzerland, where he found that those who had one episode of Smallpox were 63% more likely to suffer from a second episode as compared to those who never had a case of Smallpox, concluding, “All this justifies our maintaining that the theory of immunity by a previous attack of Smallpox, whether the natural disease or the disease produced artificially, must be relegated to the realm of fiction.”

Does that sound like “vaccines prevented people from getting smallpox”? Quite the opposite!

An 1850s Chicago Medical Journal published:

In the nineteenth century, smallpox ravaged through the US and Canada. A botanical preparation, derived from the carnivorous plant Sarracenia purpurea, was proclaimed as being a successful therapy for smallpox infections. Our work demonstrates Sarracenia purpurea as the first effective inhibitor of poxvirus replication at the level of early viral transcription.

Recorded history goes on to say,

In the late 1800’s, the Micmac Indians of Nova Scotia proclaimed the existence of a botanical-based remedy for smallpox. Herbert Miles, the Assistant Surgeon to the Royal Artillery, reported that during an outbreak of smallpox “an old squaw going amongst them, and treating the cases with (a botanical) infusion…was so successful as to cure every case.” This botanical infusion was later described as being derived from the carnivorous plant, Sarracenia purpurea.

In 1892, Charles Millspaugh described that the Native Americans of eastern North America used S. purpurea as a poultice against smallpox and it provided “the greatest remedy known for the dreadful scourge.” It was found that S. purpurea “seemed to arrest the development of the pustules, killing, as it were, the virus from within, thereby changing the character of the disease and doing away with the cause of pitting.”

S. purpurea, also known as Indian Pitcher Plant, ranges from Labrador to Florida along the Atlantic seacoast and westward to Wisconsin and Minnesota. S. purpurea is an insectivorous bog plant, the leaves of which form cups and become filled with water to capture insects.

Does that sound like “There was no treatment for smallpox before the creation of vaccines”? Quite the opposite!

In 2012, researchers at Arizona State University took a fresh look at the old remedy and conducted in vitro experiments with a Sarracenia extract. They found that it inhibited the replication of the variola (smallpox) virus.

The study, published in the journal PLOS ONE, concluded that "S. purpurea is the only known therapy that will target the virus at this point in the replication cycle.”

Writing in Chemistry World, researcher Langland says, “There is much scepticism on herbal medicine but what our results illustrate conclusively is that this herb is able to kill the virus and we can actually demonstrate how it kills the virus. It takes this herb out of the realm of folklore, and into the arena of true scientific evidence.”

Realistically, Naturopathy is the only medicine in the arena of true scientific evidence. Unlike synthetic “medicine,” Naturopathy has never been in the realm of folklore, and actually has a long well-documented history of usage. Especially TCM and Ayurveda. It would still be widely used today if it was not for Rockefeller using the media to promote his oil-based “medicine” and give real medicine a bad name. The only true “alternative” medicine is the synthetic drugs being pushed by legalized drug dealers containing their various toxic chemical ingredients that are unhealthy for you.

This study shows Smallpox mortality declined before the vaccine was introduced:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373148

Professor Alfred Russell Wallace in his book The Wonderful Century proved that people who were “vaccinated” against Smallpox actually had a significantly higher death rate from Smallpox than those who had never been “vaccinated.” He concluded:

It is thus completely demonstrated that all the statements by which the public has been gulled for so many years as to the almost complete immunity of the revaccinated Army and Navy are absolutely false. It is all what the Americans call “bluff.” There is no immunity. They have no protection. When exposed to infection they do suffer just as much as other populations or even more. In the whole of the nineteen years 1878-1896 inclusive, unvaccinated Leicester had so few smallpox deaths that the Registrar-General presents the average by the decimal 0.01 per thousand population equal to ten per million, whereas during 1876-1889, there was less than one death per annum. Here we have real immunity, real protection; and it is obtained by attending to sanitation and isolation, coupled with the almost total neglect of vaccination. Neither Army nor Navy can show any such results as this?

“Protection” via “vaccination” is an ugly superstition that must be discarded!

When some clown starts spouting off about Smallpox, now you can educate him/her as to reality.

FACTS About Influenza/Common Cold

During the Spanish Flu of 1918, the worst “pandemic” we have seen in the last 100 years, an estimated 500 million people were infected, and an estimated 20-50 million people died around the world (when our modes of travel were much slower than today). To find out if it was contagious, doctors from the US Public Health Service tried to infect one hundred healthy volunteers between the ages of 18 and 25 at a naval facility in Gallops Island in Boston Harbour.

First, they collected mucous secretions from the noses, throats, and upper respiratory tracts of those infected and transferred these secretions to the noses, mouths, and lungs of the healthy volunteers; but nothing happened.

Second, the doctors withdrew blood from the infected and injected it into the healthy volunteers; but still nothing happened.

Lastly, the doctors instructed the infected to breathe and cough on the healthy volunteers (to imitate the “natural spread” of “contagion”); but again nothing happened.

They even took the secretions from sick horses and tried to infect healthy horses; but as with the humans, nothing happened.

A sense of frustration pervades the report, which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. This frustration is well warranted. As early as 1799, when the world was not as globalized as it is today, researchers became puzzled over the cause of Influenza, which would appear suddenly in diverse places at the same time. The “contagion theory” simply does not hold any water. Observe these quotes, which are a deathblow to the “contagion theory” of spread from person to person:

“Perhaps no disease has ever been observed to affect so many people in so short a time, as the Influenza, almost a whole city, town, or neighborhood becoming affected in a few days, indeed much sooner than could be supposed to spread from contagion. Mercatus relates, that when it prevailed in Spain, in 1557, the greatest part of the people were seized in one day. Dr. Glass says, when it was rife in Exeter, in 1729, two thousand were attacked in one night.”
—Shadrach Ricketson, M.D. (1808), A Brief History of the Influenza (Shadrach Ricketson, A Brief History of the Influenza 1808, p.4)

“The simple fact is to be recollected that this epidemic affects a whole region in the space of a week; nay, a whole continent as large as North America, together with all the West Indies, in the course of a few weeks, where the inhabitants over such vast extent of country, could not, within so short a lapse of a time, have had the least communication or intercourse whatever. This fact alone is sufficient to put all idea of its being propagated by contagion from one individual to another out of the question.”
—Alexander Jones, M.D. (1827), Philadelphia Journal of the Medical and Physical Sciences (Richard Sisley, “Epidemic Influenza: Notes on Its Origin and Method of Spread”, Longmans Green and Co., p.22)

“Unlike cholera, it outstrips in its course the speed of human intercourse”
—Theophilus Thompson, M.D. (1852), Annals of Influenza or Epidemic Catarrhal Fever in Great Britain from 1510 to 1837

“Contagion alone is inadequate to explain the sudden outbreak of the disease in widely distant countries at the same time, and the curious way in which it has been known to attack the crews of ships at sea, where communication with infected places or persons was out of the question.”
—Sir Morell Mackenzie, M.D. (1893), Fortnightly Review (Mackenzie, Morell. “Fortnightly Review 55:877–86)

“Usually influenza travels at the same speed as man but at times it apparently breaks out simultaneously in widely separated parts of the globe”
—Jorgen Birkeland (1949), Microbiology and Man (H. E. Bowen, “Microbiology and Man," Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, p.445)

“[Before 1918] there are records of two other major epidemics of influenza in North America during the past two centuries. The first of these occurred in 1789, the year in which George Washington was inaugurated President. The first steamboat did not cross the Atlantic until 1819, and the first steam train did not run until 1830. Thus, this outbreak occurred when man’s fastest conveyance was the galloping horse. Despite this fact, the influenza outbreak of 1789 spread with great rapidity; many times faster and many times farther than a horse could gallop.”
—James Bordley III, M.D. and A. McGehee Harvey, M.D. (1976), Two Centuries of American Medicine, 1776–1976, p.214

“Flu virus may be communicated from person to person in droplets of moisture from the respiratory tract. However, direct communication cannot account for simultaneous outbreaks of influenza in widely separated places.”
—Roderick E. McGrew (1985), Encyclopedia of Medical History, p.151

“Why have epidemic patterns in Great Britain not altered in four centuries, centuries that have seen great increases in the speed of human transport?”
—Cannell, J. J., Zasloff, M., Garland, C. F. et al. On the Epidemiology of Influenza. Virol J 5, 29 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-5-29

Here are some other experiments that have been performed involving the common cold / flu, which were not able to prove viral causation or contagion:

1. In March of 1919, Rosenau & Keegan conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people.
   https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687
2. In November 1919, 8 separate experiments were conducted by Rosenau et al. in a group of 62 men trying to prove that influenza is contagious and causes disease. In all 8 experiments, 0/62 men became sick.
3. Another set of 8 experiments were undertaken in December of 1919 by McCoy et al. in 50 men to try and prove contagion. Once again, all 8 experiments failed to prove people with influenza, or their bodily fluids cause illness. 0/50 men became sick.
4. In 1919, Wahl et al. conducted 3 separate experiments to infect 6 healthy men with influenza by exposing them to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people. 0/6 men contracted influenza in any of the three studies- .
   https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082102?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
5. In 1920, Schmidt et al conducted two controlled experiments, exposing healthy people to the bodily fluids of sick people. Of 196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 (10.7%) developed colds and three developed grippe (1.5%). In the second group, of the 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, five developed grippe (5.9%) and four colds (4.7%). Of forty-three controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions eight (18.6%) developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the “virus.”
   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
   https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/102609951
6. In 1921, Williams et al. tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill.
   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
7. In 1924, Robertson & Groves exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. The authors concluded that 0/100 became sick as a result of being exposed to the bodily secretions.
   https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-abstract/34/4/400/832936?redirectedFrom=fulltext
8. In 1930, Dochez et al. attempted to infect a group of men experimentally with the common cold. The authors stated in their results, something that is nothing short of amazing.
   “It was apparent very early that this individual was more or less unreliable and from the start it was possible to keep him in the dark regarding our procedure. He had inconspicuous symptoms after his test injection of sterile broth and no more striking results from the cold filtrate, until an assistant, on the second day after injection, inadvertently referred to this failure to contract a cold.
   That evening and night the subject reported severe symptomatology, including sneezing, cough, sore throat and stuffiness in the nose. The next morning he was told that he had been misinformed in regard to the nature of the filtrate and his symptoms subsided within the hour. It is important to note that there was an entire absence of objective pathological changes”
   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869798/
9. In 1937, Burnet & Lush conducted an experiment exposing 200 healthy people to bodily secretions from people infected with influenza. 0/200 became sick.
   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2065253/
10. In 1940, Burnet and Foley tried to experimentally infect 15 university students with influenza. The authors concluded their experiment was a failure.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1940.tb79929.x

As you can see, there is absolutely no way that Influenza could be contagious and spread from person to person. At a time when travel was slow and limited to horses, how does one expect to explain how Influenza could be in so many varied places all at the same time? To suppose “contagion” is illogical and begs the facts. Obviously something else contributes to the cause of Influenza, something science has not figured out yet. (Or has it? With the pseudo-science of “Germ Theory” occupying the foreground, the legitimate science gets silenced and pushed to the background.)

One person wrote:

The role of the virus, which infects only the respiratory tract, has baffled some virologists because influenza is not only, or even mainly, a respiratory disease. Why the headache, the eye pain, the muscle soreness, the prostration, the occasional visual impairment, the reports of encephalitis, myocarditis, and pericarditis? Why the abortions, stillbirths, and birth defects? (Beveridge, p.15–16)

There were also reports of neurological symptoms during the initial influenza pandemics of previous centuries. Most of Medical Officer Röhring’s 239 flu patients at Erlangen, Bavaria, had neurological and cardiovascular symptoms and no respiratory disease. Nearly one-quarter of the 41,500 cases of flu reported in Pennsylvania as of May 1, 1890 were classified as primarily neurological and not respiratory. (Firstenberg, p.89)

Few of David Brakenridge’s patients in Edinburgh, or Julius Althaus’ patients in London, had respiratory symptoms. Instead they had dizziness, insomnia, indigestion, constipation, vomiting, diarrhea, “utter prostration of mental and bodily strength,” neuralgia, delirium, coma, and convulsions. Upon recovery many were left with neurasthenia, or even paralysis or epilepsy. Anton Schmitz published an article titled “Insanity After Influenza” and concluded that influenza was primarily an epidemic nervous disease. C. H. Hughes called influenza a “toxic neurosis.” Morell Mackenzie agreed:

“In my opinion the answer to the riddle of influenza is poisoned nerves… In some cases it seizes on that part of (the nervous system) which governs the machinery of respiration, in others on that which presides over the digestive functions; in others again it seems, as it were, to run up and down the nervous keyboard, jarring the delicate mechanism and stirring up disorder and pain in different parts of the body with what almost seems malicious caprice… As the nourishment of every tissue and organ in the body is under the direct control of the nervous system, it follows that anything which affects the latter has a prejudicial effect on the former; hence it is not surprising that influenza in many cases leaves its mark in damaged structure. Not only the lungs, but the kidneys, the heart, and other internal organs and the nervous matter itself may suffer in this way.” (Mackenzie, p.299–30)

Insane asylums filled up with patients who had had influenza, people suffering variously from profound depression, mania, paranoia, or hallucinations. “The number of admissions reached unprecedented proportions,” reported Albert Leledy at the Beauregard Lunatic Asylum, at Bourges, in 1891. “Admissions for the year exceed those of any previous year,” reported Thomas Clouston, superintending physician of the Royal Edinburgh Asylum for the Insane, in 1892. “No epidemic of any disease on record has had such mental effects,” he wrote. (Firstenberg, 88–89)

William Beveridge, who lived through to the 1918 pandemic, also noted that half of all Spanish influenza victims did not have any visible influenza symptoms such as nasal discharge, sneezing, or sore throat. (Beveridge, p.11)

Another indication that such pandemics have an atmospheric source is the fact that during such pandemics through history, animals also experienced similar symptoms — from swine to birds. There are multiple examples of this. For instance, when the army of King Karlmann of Bavaria was seized by influenza in 876 A.D., the same disease also decimated the dogs and the birds. (Firstenberg 89)

In later epidemics, up to and including the twentieth century, illness was commonly reported to break out among dogs, cats, horses, mules, sheep, cows, birds, deer, rabbits, and even fish at the same time as humans. (Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 1848, p.173)

Beveridge listed twelve epidemics during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries in which horses caught the flu, usually one or two months before the humans. In fact, this association was considered so reliable that in early December 1889, Symes Thompson, observing flu-like illness in British horses, wrote to the British Medical Journal predicting an imminent outbreak in humans, a forecast which shortly proved true. (Beveridge, p.56)

Similar deaths in other animals also occurred during the Spanish flu pandemic. (The Lancet, “Medical Influenza Victims in South Africa”, Volume 193, Issue 4976, 11 January 1919, Pages 75–78)

The fact that increased incidences of death is also observed in animals during pandemics is a major blow to the contagion theory. The deaths of other species strongly suggests that pandemics are largely a result of atmospheric and/or technological shocks to the ecosystem.

Seventeen years of surveillance by Hope-Simpson in and around the community of Cirencester, England, revealed that despite popular belief, influenza is not readily communicated from one person to another within a household. Seventy percent of the time, even during the “Hong Kong flu” pandemic of 1968, only one person in a household would get the flu. If a second person had the flu, both often caught it on the same day, which meant that they did not catch it from each other. Sometimes different minor variants of the virus were circulating in the same village, even in the same household, and on one occasion two young brothers who shared a bed had different variants of the virus, proving that they could not have caught it from each other, or even from the same third person. (HOPE-SIMPSON, R. E. (1979) Epidemic mechanisms of type A influenza. Journal of Hygiene v. 83, p. 18).

The embarrassing secret among virologists is that from 1933 until the present day, there have been no experimental studies proving that influenza — either the "virus" or the disease — is ever transmitted from person to person by normal contact. All efforts to transmit the disease from one person to another — even during a pandemic — have been unsuccessful (as you have witnessed from the above experiments/studies).