Unbelievably, there are individuals, such as Jeremy James, who ignorantly believe that “dinosaurs” (dragons) are a myth and a complete fraud. Not only do these people ignore historic writings where the authors describe dragons of varying types, not only do they ignore ancient paintings of dragons that just happen to resemble our “dinosaurs” of today, but they also claim that none of the ancient world dug up any such animals or recorded having dug them up.
First, the great catastrophe that wiped out the majority of these creatures was Noah’s flood; not some asteroid or volcano. Second, these civilizations likely encountered some of these creatures and killed them, and so were not overly surprised by some of them. Third, the ancients were not obsessed with the past or with dead bones the way we are. When they dug up bones, like any normal person, they discarded them. Last, the historical writings describing dragons (not the mythical Hollywood dragons you are used to) are clear evidence of their existence. Not only that, but do you honestly believe the Chinese have eleven real animals and one mythical animal on their calendar?
There are far more “dinosaurs” today compared to when I was a child. However, how many of them have actual fossils and how many are purely fiction, found only in books and videos? As I said in the past, one of their “dinosaurs” they have only ever found two arm bones and three vertebrae, and yet they show you what it looked like and give you a full back story on it. If you have never seen a human being before and all you find are two arm bones and three vertebrae, not only will you never be able to produce an accurate depiction of how they looked, but you also will never know how they behaved, what they ate, or how powerful they were.
Another dinosaur (I believe it was the Spinosaurus), they talk about how powerful it was and how sharp its claws were and built a robot arm to “replicate” its power and claws. All the bones tell you is that it once lived and is now dead. There is no scientific way that you could know how powerful it was or to accurately reflect it. This robot arm was pure conjecture. The robot arm can be as weak or as strong as you make it, and it was likely an exaggeration of the creature’s true power, which they claim its claws could rip right through a car door like butter. They have zero physical, scientific evidence of what these creatures looked like, how they behaved, what they ate, or how powerful they were. The shape of teeth does not tell you anything. If you find a well-preserved “dinosaur,” all that tells you is what its last meal was. For all you know, they were omnivores.
You need to learn to think critically for yourself and stop blindly believing all the crap these “scientific” liars hoist upon you. Everything they tell you about these creatures, where is the evidence to back their stories? Have they ever observed these creatures in order to verify what they are saying? Evidential facts get impaled by these people’s conviction of dogma, too. They only see what they want to see, what they have been told to see. This is why they never date the bones they find, because they believe by faith that they are millions of years old, and are afraid of the facts to contradict their beliefs. Ignorant fools, such as Jeremy James, who deny the existence of “dinosaurs” and the physical evidence before their eyes suffer from a special kind of delusion. But then again, Jeremy James is one of those ignorant clowns who believes the Earth to be flat and stationary. Go figure.
If “dinosaurs” are a complete hoax, as these individuals claim, then how do they explain this Mayan mural from around A.D. 600 depicting the head of a “dinosaur”? The head is clearly larger than the heads of the people carrying it. These people were not stupid (though we cannot say the same for many people today). Furthermore, how do they explain the Nasca Indians (c. 200 B.C. to A.D. 600) depicting “dinosaurs” in their art, as seen in the three stones below? What is even more fascinating is that Sauropod frills, such as seen on the Diplodocus in the second stone, were not found until 1992. Yet, they were being drawn correctly 2,000 years earlier by the Nasca Indians!
 |
 |
 |
A stone temple in Cambodia from A.D. 1186 has an unmistakeable carving of a Stegosaurus on it. How did they know what a Stegosaurus looked like 800 years ago if “dinosaurs” are a complete hoax, or if they have supposedly been extinct for some “65 million years“?
In Acambaro, Mexico in 1945, a bunch of figurines were discovered. These figurines have been dated back to circa 2500 B.C. There were some 33,000 sculptures unearthed, hundreds of which appear to be dinosaurs, as you can see from the other images. And notice how Iguanodon was sculpted perfectly as we now know he looked today, as opposed to the early erroneous depictions. How do these individuals account for this? Was the entire world in on this fraudulent hoax prior to the 19th century when they first “discovered” them? These individuals, such as Jeremy James, are intellectually embarrassing.
 |
 |
 |
P.S.: The reason I put "dinosaurs" in quotation marks is because the correct term for these creatures, before the crook Richard Owen coined the phrase 'dinosaur,' was DRAGONS. This term was being used for centuries before the mythical Hollywood "dragons" arrived on the scene to obscure the reality (the same way 'unicorn' underwent a definition change in dictionaries in favour of the mythical and dropping the reality).