“For a long time I lived under an illusion that somehow or another facts would change people’s behaviour. I’m disappointed to say that I have yet to meet a fact that doesn’t find itself impaled on the conviction of dogma.” —Dr. David Martin
“We want the facts to fit the preconceptions. When they don’t, it is easier to ignore the facts than to change the preconceptions.” —Mary Jessamyn West
"It is a small and narrow mind that is afraid to change; it is a sign of greatness that one is prepared to admit at times that one has been mistaken, and that therefore you have had to change your position." ―David Martyn Lloyd-Jones
During the Spanish Flu of 1918, the worst “pandemic” we have seen in the last 100 years, an estimated 500 million people were infected, and an estimated 20-50 million people died around the world (when our modes of travel were much slower than today). To find out if it was contagious, doctors from the US Public Health Service tried to infect one hundred healthy volunteers between the ages of 18 and 25 at a naval facility in Gallops Island in Boston Harbour.
First, they collected mucous secretions from the noses, throats, and upper respiratory tracts of those infected and transferred these secretions to the noses, mouths, and lungs of the healthy volunteers; but nothing happened.
Second, the doctors withdrew blood from the infected and injected it into the healthy volunteers; but still nothing happened.
Lastly, the doctors instructed the infected to breathe and cough on the healthy volunteers (to imitate the “natural spread” of “contagion”); but again nothing happened.
They even took the secretions from sick horses and tried to infect healthy horses; but as with the humans, nothing happened.
A sense of frustration pervades the report, which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. This frustration is well warranted. As early as 1799, when the world not as globalized as it is today, researchers became puzzled over the cause of Influenza, which would appear suddenly in diverse places at the same time. The “contagion theory” simply does not hold any water. Observe these quotes, which are a deathblow to the “contagion theory” of spread from person to person:
“Perhaps no disease has ever been observed to affect so many people in so short a time, as the Influenza, almost a whole city, town, or neighborhood becoming affected in a few days, indeed much sooner than could be supposed to spread from contagion. Mercatus relates, that when it prevailed in Spain, in 1557, the greatest part of the people were seized in one day. Dr. Glass says, when it was rife in Exeter, in 1729, two thousand were attacked in one night.”
—Shadrach Ricketson, M.D. (1808), A Brief History of the Influenza (Shadrach Ricketson, A Brief History of the Influenza 1808, p.4)“The simple fact is to be recollected that this epidemic affects a whole region in the space of a week; nay, a whole continent as large as North America, together with all the West Indies, in the course of a few weeks, where the inhabitants over such vast extent of country, could not, within so short a lapse of a time, have had the least communication or intercourse whatever. This fact alone is sufficient to put all idea of its being propagated by contagion from one individual to another out of the question.”
—Alexander Jones, M.D. (1827), Philadelphia Journal of the Medical and Physical Sciences (Richard Sisley, “Epidemic Influenza: Notes on Its Origin and Method of Spread”, Longmans Green and Co., p.22)“Unlike cholera, it outstrips in its course the speed of human intercourse”
—Theophilus Thompson, M.D. (1852), Annals of Influenza or Epidemic Catarrhal Fever in Great Britain from 1510 to 1837“Contagion alone is inadequate to explain the sudden outbreak of the disease in widely distant countries at the same time, and the curious way in which it has been known to attack the crews of ships at sea, where communication with infected places or persons was out of the question.”
—Sir Morell Mackenzie, M.D. (1893), Fortnightly Review (Mackenzie, Morell. “Fortnightly Review 55:877–86)“Usually influenza travels at the same speed as man but at times it apparently breaks out simultaneously in widely separated parts of the globe”
—Jorgen Birkeland (1949), Microbiology and Man (H. E. Bowen, “Microbiology and Man," Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, p.445)“[Before 1918] there are records of two other major epidemics of influenza in North America during the past two centuries. The first of these occurred in 1789, the year in which George Washington was inaugurated President. The first steamboat did not cross the Atlantic until 1819, and the first steam train did not run until 1830. Thus, this outbreak occurred when man’s fastest conveyance was the galloping horse. Despite this fact, the influenza outbreak of 1789 spread with great rapidity; many times faster and many times farther than a horse could gallop.”
—James Bordley III, M.D. and A. McGehee Harvey, M.D. (1976), Two Centuries of American Medicine, 1776–1976, p.214“Flu virus may be communicated from person to person in droplets of moisture from the respiratory tract. However, direct communication cannot account for simultaneous outbreaks of influenza in widely separated places.”
—Roderick E. McGrew (1985), Encyclopedia of Medical History, p.151“Why have epidemic patterns in Great Britain not altered in four centuries, centuries that have seen great increases in the speed of human transport?”
—Cannell, J. J., Zasloff, M., Garland, C. F. et al. On the Epidemiology of Influenza. Virol J 5, 29 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-5-29
Here are some other experiments that have been performed involving the common cold / flu, which were not able to prove viral causation or contagion:
- In March of 1919, Rosenau & Keegan conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687- In November 1919, 8 separate experiments were conducted by Rosenau et al. in a group of 62 men trying to prove that influenza is contagious and causes disease. In all 8 experiments, 0/62 men became sick.
- Another set of 8 experiments were undertaken in December of 1919 by McCoy et al. in 50 men to try and prove contagion. Once again, all 8 experiments failed to prove people with influenza, or their bodily fluids cause illness. 0/50 men became sick.
- In 1919, Wahl et al. conducted 3 separate experiments to infect 6 healthy men with influenza by exposing them to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people. 0/6 men contracted influenza in any of the three studies- .
https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082102?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents- In 1920, Schmidt et al conducted two controlled experiments, exposing healthy people to the bodily fluids of sick people. Of 196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 (10.7%) developed colds and three developed grippe (1.5%). In the second group, of the 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, five developed grippe (5.9%) and four colds (4.7%). Of forty-three controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions eight (18.6%) developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the “virus.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/102609951- In 1921, Williams et al. tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/- In 1924, Robertson & Groves exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. The authors concluded that 0/100 became sick as a result of being exposed to the bodily secretions.
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-abstract/34/4/400/832936?redirectedFrom=fulltext- In 1930, Dochez et al. attempted to infect a group of men experimentally with the common cold. The authors stated in their results, something that is nothing short of amazing.
“It was apparent very early that this individual was more or less unreliable and from the start it was possible to keep him in the dark regarding our procedure. He had inconspicuous symptoms after his test injection of sterile broth and no more striking results from the cold filtrate, until an assistant, on the second day after injection, inadvertently referred to this failure to contract a cold.
That evening and night the subject reported severe symptomatology, including sneezing, cough, sore throat and stuffiness in the nose. The next morning he was told that he had been misinformed in regard to the nature of the filtrate and his symptoms subsided within the hour. It is important to note that there was an entire absence of objective pathological changes”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869798/- In 1937, Burnet & Lush conducted an experiment exposing 200 healthy people to bodily secretions from people infected with influenza. 0/200 became sick.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2065253/- In 1940, Burnet and Foley tried to experimentally infect 15 university students with influenza. The authors concluded their experiment was a failure.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1940.tb79929.x
Many other experiments like these have been done with other “diseases,” like Measles and Chickenpox, and they, likewise, have not been able to prove viral causation or contagion. Here are some of the studies for Measles:
- In 1799, Dr. Green reported that he successfully infected three children by exposing them to the fluid of measles scabs, however there are no reliable records on this.[1]
- In 1809, Willan tried to infect three children by exposing them to the fluid of measles lesions from sick people. None of the children became sick.[1]
- In 1810, Waschel claimed to have experimentally infected an 18-year-old man with measles, however these claims were disputed by others at the time. The man became sick 22 days after inoculation and it is said the man actually contracted measles naturally and not from the inoculation.[1]
- In 1817, Themmen undertook five experiments where he exposed incisions on the arms of healthy children with the blood, tears and perspiration of infected children. None of the children contracted measles.
- In 1822, Dr. Frigori tried to infect 6 children with measles. Whilst the children developed mild non-specific symptoms, they did not develop measles. Not happy with his results, Frigori attempted to infect himself but without success.[1]
- In 1822, Dr. Negri tried to infect two children with measles, however he had the same negative results as Dr. Frigori.[1]
- In 1822, Speranza attempted to infect 4 children using similar methods, but without success.[1]
- In 1834, Albers tried to infect four children with measles, however none fell ill.[1]
- Between 1845–1851 Mayr is said to have successfully infected 6 children with measles, however it seems to be a modified form of the disease (in other words, not measles).[1]
- In 1890, Hugh Thompson tried to infect children with measles in two separate instances, however both attempts failed.[1]
- In 1905, Ludvig Hektoen reports that he was able to successfully infect two healthy people with the blood of infected measles patients.[1] It should be noted that the blood was mixed with other substances, such as ascites fluid before it was injected. This experiment is considered to be the best evidence that proves beyond any doubt that the measles virus causes disease.[2] There are few specific details about the signs and symptoms that these patients actually exhibited, so there is some doubt as to whether they really had measles.[3]
- In 1915, Charles Herman swabbed the nasal mucosa of 40 infants with cotton buds covered in the nasal secretions of infected measles patients. The majority of the infants had no reaction, 15 infants had a slight rise in body temperature and a “few” were said to develop some red spots on their skin. At 1 year of age, 4 of these infants had intimate contact with infected people. None of the infants became sick and this is said to be due to the infants having “immunity.”[4]
- In 1919, Sellards tried to inoculate 8 healthy men (with no previous exposure to measles) with the blood of measles patients, using the same methods as Hektoen. None of the men became sick.[3,5] A few weeks later, the volunteers were exposed to an infected measles case, yet none of them became sick. Nasal secretions were then taken from measles patients and syringed up in to the nasal passages of the healthy participants. None became sick.[3,5]
- Sellards also conducted another experiment to try and infect another 2 healthy human volunteers with measles by injecting them subcutaneously and intramuscularly with the blood of two infected patients. Neither man became sick.[3,5]
- In 1919, Alfred Hess makes a comment about Sellards results. He states “It is remarkable that Sellards was unable to produce this highly infectious disease by means of the blood or nasal secretions of infected individuals, not long ago I was confronted with a similar experience with chicken pox, thus we are confronted with two diseases, the two most infectious of the endemic diseases in this part of the world, which we are unable to transmit artificially from man to man.”[6]
- In 1924, Harry Bauguess wrote a paper and stated “A careful search of the literature does not reveal a case in which the blood from a patient having measles was injected into the blood stream of another person and produced measles.”[7]
Sources:
[1] Hektoen L. Experimental Measles. J Infect Dis. 1905;2(2):238–255. doi:10.1093/infdis/2.2.238
[2] Degkwitz R. The Etiology of Measles. J Infect Dis. 1927;41(4):304–316. doi:10.1093/infdis/41.4.304
[3] SELLARDS AW. A REVIEW OF THE INVESTIGATIONS CONCERNING THE ETIOLOGY OF MEASLES. Medicine (Baltimore). 1924;3(2):99–136. doi:10.1097/00005792–192403020–00001
[4] Herman C. Immunization against measles. Arch Pediat. 1915;32(503).
[5] Sellards A. Insusceptibility of man to inoculation with blood from measles patients. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1919;257.
[6] Hess AF. NEED OF FURTHER RESEARCH ON THE TRANSMISSIBILITY OF MEASLES AND VARICELLA. J Am Med Assoc. 1919;73(16):1232. doi:10.1001/jama.1919.0261042006002
[7] BAUGUESS H. MEASLES TRANSMITTED BY BLOOD TRANSFUSION. Am J Dis Child. 1924;27(3):256. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1924.019200900610
You cannot catch a virus! You cannot catch anything from someone else breathing, coughing, or sneezing on you or in your direction! No virus has ever been isolated, purified, and characterized, and proven to cause disease, let alone spread from person to person. None! Go ahead and send a FOI (Freedom of Information) request to any Public Health institution and ask them for any and all records of evidence-based scientific data that demonstrates unequivocally that they have isolated/purified any of the viruses. The response you will receive is that they “could find no such records.”
Two doctors, Dr. Fraser of Canada and Dr. Powell of California, experimented with billions of germs of all varieties, but they have never been able to produce a single disease in anyone when introducing the germs by natural means into human subjects.
Dr. Waite tried for years to prove “germ theory,” but had zero success.
“Of all germ-distributors, the most notorious was Dr Arthur W. Waite, who, in the year 1916, was an embarrassment to medical science. In his bacteriological laboratory, he had billions of germs. Waite planned to kill his father-in-law, John E. Peck, 435 Riverside Drive, New York City. He fed the old man germs of Diptheria, but got no results. He induced Peck to use a nasal spray, in which he had planted colonies of the germs of tuberculosis. Not a cough. He fed the old man calomel, to weaken his resistance. He turned loose hordes of germs of typhoid, and then influenza. In desperation, he lost all standing in the annals of distinctive crimes, and went common, or used arsenic. The old-fashioned method was a success. One’s impression is that, if anything, diets and inhalations of germs may be healthful.” —Charles Fort
Even Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch could not find evidence of contagion using his four postulates. Interestingly enough, he abandoned his first postulate when he discovered carriers of cholera and typhoid fever who did not get sick. Bacteriologists and virologists today believe his postulates have been recognized as largely obsolete by epidemiologists since the 1950s.
Thomas Rivers dropped Koch’s first postulate and modified the remainder of postulates in order to determine the infectiousness of viruses. Unfortunately, researchers still cannot prove a specific virus causes a specific illness or disease using Rivers’ postulates.
No disease (dis-ease) attributed to bacteria or “viruses” has ever met all of Koch’s or Rivers’ postulates. These do not cause disease! (Not in the way that Germ Theory postulates, anyway.)
“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” —Terry Allen
The onus is on those making the claims that viruses exist to prove they exist.
FACT: No one in the entire world has ever isolated, purified, or characterized any “virus,” thereby proving its existence!
FACT: Neither Koch’s postulates nor Rivers’ postulates, which are completely logical, have ever been completely met in order to prove “contagion” from either bacteria, germs, or “viruses”!
FACT: No bacteria, germ, or “virus” has ever been demonstrated and proven, using the scientific method, to be “contagious” and spread from person to person!
FACT: “Viruses” have been misidentified. What they are identifying as “viruses” are merely dead cell debris eaters.
FACT: Contagion is a myth!
As soon as people come to grips with reality and accept these facts, instead of impaling them on their blind convictions of established dogma, the better humanity will be for it.
“If the ‘germ theory of disease’ were correct, there’d be no one living to believe it.” —B. J. Palmer
“If virulent [hostile] germs were normal in the atmosphere, how numerous would be the occasions for their penetration independently by way of the lungs and intestinal mucus! There would not be a wound, however slight, the prick even of a pin, that would not be the occasion for infecting us with smallpox, typhus, syphilis, gonorrhoea.” —Antoine Béchamp
“The primary cause of disease is in us, always in us.” —Antoine Béchamp
“Diseases of any kind are crises of purification, of toxic elimination. Symptoms are the natural defenses of the body. We call them diseases, but in fact they are the cure of diseases.” —Hippocrates (c. 460 - c. 370 BC), father of medicine
"Doctors are men who prescribe medicines of which they know little, to cure diseases of which they know less, in human beings of whom they know nothing." —Voltaire
“Vaccine science is junk science!”
A common question: “If there is no such thing as an infectious virus, then why did diseases decline and/or vaccines eradicate these diseases?”
The answer is simple:
- Vaccines never eradicated anything and an unbiased review of the evidence demonstrates vaccines do not work at all, unless harming people and making a lot of money for pharmaceutical companies is the goal.
- Disease declined because of improvement in the HUMAN TERRAIN.
FACT: Vaccines are not responsible for the reduction of illnesses; changes in living conditions are: Cleaner drinking water, fresher foods, better nutritional information, less crowding of living spaces, sanitation removal, plumbing, etc.
FACT: Vaccines are responsible for numerous illnesses and disorders of the blood, brain, nervous system, and skin; including cancer. Just look at the increase of such ever since the onset of mass vaccination from 1950 onward. This is not a “coincidence”!
“The 19th-century population shift from country to city that accompanied industrialization and immigration led to overcrowding in newly populated cities that lacked proper sanitation or clean water systems. These conditions resulted in repeated outbreaks of cholera, dysentery, TB, typhoid fever, influenza, yellow fever, and malaria.
By 1900, however, the incidence of many of these diseases had begun to decline because of public health improvements, implementation of which continued into the 20th century. Sanitation & Hygiene.
Local, state, and federal efforts to improve sanitation and hygiene reinforced the concept of collective ‘public health’ action (e.g. to prevent infection by providing clean drinking water). By 1900, 40 of the 45 states had established health departments. The first county health departments were established in 1908.
From the 1930s through the 1950s, state and local health departments made substantial progress in disease prevention activities, including sewage disposal, water treatment, food safety, organized solid waste disposal, and public education about hygienic practices (e.g. food handling and handwashing).”
https://learntherisk.org/vaccines/diseases/1871-1872 England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox outbreak with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. —The Hadwen Documents
In Germany, compulsory mass vaccination against diphtheria commenced in 1940 and by 1945 diphtheria cases were up from 40,000 to 250,000. —Hannah Allen, Don't Get Stuck!
In the USA in 1960, two virologists discovered that both polio vaccines were contaminated with the SV 40 virus which causes cancer in animals as well as changes in human cell tissue cultures. Millions of children have been injected with these vaccines. —Med Journal of Australia 3/17/1973 p.555
In 1967, Ghana was declared measles free by the World Health Organization after 96% of its population was vaccinated. In 1972, Ghana experienced one of its worst measles outbreaks with its highest ever mortality rate. —Dr. H. Albonico, MMR Vaccine Campaign in Switzerland, 1990
In the UK between 1970 and 1990, over 200,000 cases of whooping cough occurred in fully vaccinated children. —Community Disease Surveillance Centre, UK
In the 1970’s a tuberculosis vaccine trial in India involving 260,000 people revealed that more cases of TB occurred in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. —The Lancet 12/1/80 p.73
In 1975 it took only 2 deaths of Japanese children following inoculations using the American DPT vaccine to ban its use there forever. —Vaccine Roulette, 1993
In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk, who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. —Science 4/4/77 “Abstracts”
In 1978, a survey of 30 States in the US revealed that more than half of the children who contracted measles had been adequately vaccinated. —The People's Doctor Dr. Robert Mendelsohn
In 1979, Sweden abandoned the whooping cough vaccine due to its ineffectiveness. Out of 5,140 cases in 1978, it was found that 84% had been vaccinated three times. —BMJ 283:696-697, 1981
"Scientific medicine has taken credit it does not deserve for some advances in health. Most people believe that victory over the infectious diseases of the last century came with the invention of immunizations. In fact, cholera, typhoid, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough, etc., were in decline before vaccines for them became available - the result of better methods of sanitation, sewage disposal, and distribution of food and water." —Dr. Andrew Weil, Health and Healing
Pellagra was labeled a “contagious disease” until they found out it was a nutritional deficiency. Typhoid, Cholera, Yellow Fever, and other “infectious diseases” disappeared when people were provided clean water and sanitation. Polio was/is associated with DDT and other toxins. Toxins and poisons and deficiencies are more frequently the cause of what people call “viruses,” which aligns more scientifically with the Terrain Model.
German biologist Stefan Lanka offered 100,000 euros to anyone who could prove the existence of the Measles virus. A young doctor named David Bardens decided to try and take up the challenge, providing six studies as “proof” that the virus did indeed exist. The studies, however, failed to meet the scientific evidence required in order to claim the prize. Bardens decided to take Lanka to court.
In the first court to hear the proceedings, the judge concluded that proof of the virus did indeed exist and awarded the prize to Bardens. However, the German Supreme Court, with its more stringent rules of evidence and the appointment of a science master to oversee the case, ruled that Bardens did not actually prove the existence of the virus. Decades of consensus-building processes created a model of a Measles virus that does not actually exist. Lanka did not have to pay the prize.
This ruling was important because it raised a dire question: What was actually injected into millions of people around the world over the past several decades? It certainly was not a Measles vaccine!
Measles exist, but it is not the result of an outside “virus” invading your body and trying to injure or kill you. Measles is a natural developmental process of the body that helps children develop a healthy, robust, adult immune system. Consider it an upgrade.
I do not know what these scientists are studying or experimenting with, but they are clearly not “viruses.” How can you study or experiment with something that has never been isolated, purified, or characterized? It is impossible!
If and when a bacterium appears, it is not because someone “caught” it. It is because the cells in our body use the bacteria to cleanse out the toxicity that we have either ingested or inhaled. This can be observed from the pleomorphic nature of bacteria in how they change shape according to their environment, as amply demonstrated from the work of Pierre Jacques Antoine Béchamp (1816-1908). The presence of a microbe does not mean it is the cause of disease; rather, it is a symptom of disease.
“Germ Theory” is simply untrue. We are being repeatedly poisoned and it is all based on complete deception and fabrication. The Terrain is everything!
Here is how the superstition of modern “medicine” using smoke and mirrors actually works:
“We have never isolated, purified, or characterized a single ‘virus,’ or proven that one is the actual cause of any disease. So, you will just have to trust us that they exist and are ‘contagious.’”
“We know that the ‘virus’ infects and kills humans even though we have never tested the ‘virus’ on humans because that would be unethical. Therefore, we do our testing on animals, even though when we test animals they do not get sick, because they are not proper ‘hosts’ for the ‘virus.’ So, you will just have to trust us.”