God Did Not Return Jews to Israel in 1948

I have often said that it was not God who brought the Jews back to the land of Israel in 1948. With regard to the Babylonian captivity, God's Word states emphatically and unequivocally that for the Jews to be returned to the land they must return to God with their whole heart, mind, and soul. Scripture never promises another return after the events of A.D. 70! Anyone who claims otherwise is ignoring the historical context and twisting Scripture. Nevertheless, if they were to be returned again, this same stipulation would have to be met. Today, that means that they would have to accept Jesus as their Messiah. This has never been done! Jews are not saved on account of their "race." If they want to receive salvation, they must receive it in the exact same manner as everyone else. Jews who adhere to Judaism today believe that the Talmud is the "life of Judaism." The Talmud has several extremely repulsive things to say about Jesus and Christians. Observe:

"Jesus fornicated with his jack ass." Sanhedrin 105a-b

"Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being boiled in hot semen. Christians are boiled in dung." Gittin 57a

I have also said that it was the Zionists who brought the Jews back to Israel in 1948. To be honest, I never really knew much about the Zionists. I just assumed that it was another term for Dispensationalists, or Semitophiles. It turns out that Zionism was founded by Theodor Herzl in 1895. He wrote a small book titled Der Judenstaat (The State of the Jews). Here are some of the things he put forth in his booklet:

"The idea I have developed in this pamphlet is an ancient one: It is the restoration of the Jewish State ..."

"The decisive factor is our propelling force. And what is that force? The plight of the Jews ... I am profoundly convinced that I am right, though I doubt whether I shall live to see myself proved so. Those who today inaugurate this movement are unlikely to live to see its glorious culmination. But the very inauguration is enough to inspire in them a high pride and the joy of an inner liberation of their existence ..."

"The plan would seem mad enough if a single individual were to undertake it; but if many Jews simultaneously agree on it, it is entirely reasonable, and its achievement presents no difficulties worth mentioning. The idea depends only on the number of its adherents. Perhaps our ambitious young men, to whom every road of advancement is now closed, and for whom the Jewish state throws open a bright prospect of freedom, happiness, and honor, perhaps they will see to it that this idea is spread ..."

"It depends on the Jews themselves whether this political document remains for the present a political romance. If this generation is too dull to understand it rightly, a future, finer, more advanced generation will arise to comprehend it. The Jews who will try it shall achieve their State; and they will deserve it ..."

"I consider the Jewish question neither a social nor a religious one, even though it sometimes takes these and other forms. It is a national question, and to solve it we must first of all establish it as an international political problem to be discussed and settled by the civilized nations of the world in council.

"We are a people—one people.

"We have sincerely tried everywhere to merge with the national communities in which we live, seeking only to preserve the faith of our fathers. It is not permitted us. In vain are we loyal patriots, sometimes superloyal; in vain do we make the same sacrifices of life and property as our fellow citizens; in vain do we strive to enhance the fame of our native lands in the arts and sciences, or her wealth by trade and commerce. In our native lands where we have lived for centuries we are still decried as aliens, often by men whose ancestors had not yet come at a time when Jewish sighs had long been heard in the country ..."

"Oppression and persecution cannot exterminate us. No nation on earth has endured such struggles and sufferings as we have. Jew-baiting has merely winnowed out our weaklings; the strong among us defiantly return to their own whenever persecution breaks out ..."

"Wherever we remain politically secure for any length of time, we assimilate. I think this is not praiseworthy ..."

"Israel is our unforgettable historic homeland ..."

"Let me repeat once more my opening words: The Jews who will it shall achieve their State. We shall live at last as free men on our own soil, and in our own homes peacefully die. The world will be liberated by our freedom, enriched by our wealth, magnified by our greatness. And whatever we attempt there for our own benefit will redound mightily and beneficially to the good of all mankind."

They even considered some land in Turkey and some land in modern Kenya.

I have no doubt that it was the Zionists who made the revisionist changes to the Scofield Reference Bible. After the death of C. I. Scofield, the notes in the Scofield Reference Bible exploded and were accelerated to advance the Zionist aims. Much of Scofield's original notes were removed and replaced with more heavily Zionist-friendly notes. In 1908, Scofield wrote concerning John 8:37:

"Cf. John 8:39. The contrast, 'I know that ye are Abraham's seed' — 'If ye were Abraham's children' is that between the natural and the spiritual posterity of Abraham. The Israelitish people and the Ishmaelitish people are the former; all who are 'of like precious faith with Abraham,' whether Jews or Gentiles, are the latter; Romans 9:6-8; Galatians 3:6-14. See 'Abrahamic Covenant,' Gen 15:18."

Compare that with the Oxford note substituted in the 1967 edition:

"All Jews are natural descendants of Abraham, but are not necessarily his spiritual posterity; Romans 9:6-8, Galatians 3:6-14."

Scofield's original footnote was accurate with Christian teachings and belief of the previous 1900 years. The revised footnote is a fallacious heresy. How can "all Jews" be "natural descendants of Abraham," a Chaldean who lived some 3,000 years ago? People of all ethnicities and nationalities are Jews, and new Jews are being converted every day from every ethnicity and nationality. You might as well say that all Lutherans are the natural descendants of Martin Luther. That is how preposterous and nonsensical this new footnote is. The publishers of this Bible (The Oxford University Press) clearly have an agenda: the advancement of the fallacious, erroneous, and heretical teachings of Zionism.

Take this brazen and outrageous newly inserted footnote from the 1967 edition concerning Genesis 12:3:

“For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgment.”

There is no word for “anti-Semitism” in the New Testament, nor is it found among the Ten Commandments. “Sin” is a personal concept. It is something done by individuals in conflict with God’s words, not by “nations.” Even Sodom did not sin—its people did. The word “judgment” in the Bible always refers to God’s action. In the New Testament, Jesus promises both judgment and salvation for individuals, not for “nations.” There was also no “State of Israel” when Scofield wrote his original notes in his Scofield Reference Bible in 1908. All references to Israel as a state were added after 1947, when Israel was granted statehood by edict of the United Nations. The Oxford University Press simply rewrote its version of the Christian Bible in 1967 to make antipathy toward the “State of Israel” a “sin.” Israel is made a god to be worshiped, not merely a “state.” That is exactly what Christian Zionism does: it worships the state of Israel as a god. Hence why they teach and believe that the entire Bible is Israel-centric; all about Israel.

The Oxford 1967 edition continues concerning Genesis 12:1-3:

"(2) God made an unconditional promise of blessings through Abram's seed (a) to the nation of Israel to inherit a specific territory forever"
"(3) There is a promise of blessing upon those individuals and nations who bless Abram's descendants, and a curse laid upon those who persecute the Jews."

This bequeath is joined to an Oxford prophesy that never occurs in the Bible itself:

"It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted the Jew, well with those who have protected him." and "The future will still more remarkably prove this principle."

None of these notes appeared in the original Scofield Reference Bible or in the 1917 or 1945 editions. The state of Israel did not exist in 1945, and according to the best dictionaries of the time, the word “Israel” only referred to a particular man and an ancient tribe, which is consistent with the Bible text. See “Israel,” Webster’s New International Dictionary 2nd (1950) Edition.

God is sovereign over all things. He may have allowed Jews to obtain land and start occupying it (just as He allowed sin to enter the world), but He never personally brought them back to it the way He did after the Babylonian captivity. Had He, then they would not only possess all the land (as they had in the past, the fulfillment of such being acknowledged on four different occasions: Josh. 11:23; 21:41-45; 1 Kings 4:20-21; Neh. 9:21-25), but they would also have embraced Jesus as their promised Messiah. Zionism and Dispensationalism are two sides of the same deceptive, demonic coin, peddling the false doctrine of Restoration theology.

Exposing the Deeds of Darkness

Christians are not supposed to turn a blind eye and remain ignorant. We are to "be wise as serpents, and harmless as doves" (Matt. 10:16) and to "not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them" (Eph. 5:11). When we expose wicked deeds and are called ignorant words, we should not let that deter us. When you see ad hominem attack, when you see someone going after the individual in order to circumvent what they are saying, in order to dodge and evade the issues (often by way of obfuscation, technicalities, ambiguous language, and equivocation), being unable to argue the main point and never providing a reasonable refutation or an intelligent counter-argument (merely presenting subjective opinions and irrational feelings), that is a person speaking by way of the devil. It is a confession of intellectual bankruptcy. When the truth is not on your side, you have to rely on denial, deflection, projection, manipulation, smearing, gaslighting, jamming, "cancelling," framing, ad hominem, character assassination, intimidation, and the use of fallacious arguments that have no basis in reality.

"Racism" of any kind is unacceptable! Acknowledging the fact that most Jews are underhanded and untrustworthy is in no way "anti-Semitic" and in no way means that we should hate Jews; only that we should be aware of their true nature and character. Hatred toward any group of people accomplishes nothing, and has never been of any good or benefit. For Christians, it is especially unacceptable given the Lord Jesus' command to us: "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which spitefully use you, and persecute you" (Matthew 5:44).

The Talmud is the Jewish bible, and it is the "life of Judaism" to this very day. The most prominent Jewish sources of our day admit:

"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees." —Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

"Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered." —Rabbi Dr. Louis Finkelstein

"The Talmud is, then, the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the Traditions of the Elders." —Rabbi Michael L. Rodkinson

Jesus had a strong condemnation against their traditions:

"Why also do you transgress the command of God on account of your traditions?"—Jesus of Nazareth to the Pharisees, Matthew 15:3

Most people, including professing Christians who hold to the bankrupt theology of Dispensationalism, are completely unaware that the Talmud has the most repulsive things to say about Christ Jesus, as well as Christians. Observe this instance:

"Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being boiled in hot semen. Christians are boiled in dung." Gittin 57a

If you, as a professing Christian, do not find that offensive, then perhaps you should examine yourself to see if you truly are a Christian. Nevertheless, such blatant disrespect of the Creator of the world and of our Lord and Saviour is not an attack on us. It is likewise not an excuse to hate or commit violence against such people. What did Jesus say? "Blessed are you when men hate you, and ostracize you, and insult you, and scorn your name as evil, for the sake of the Son of Man" (Luke 6:22).

Before we continue looking at the most grotesque statements made in the Jewish Talmud, believed by Jews, let us look at some other facts.

• 100% of Hollywood is owned and controlled by Jews.
• Six (6) Jewish companies own 96% of the world's media.
• Approximately 80% of politicians, judges, teachers, and corporation owners are Jewish. Certainly the majority of owners of valuable items such as gold, silver, platinum, etc., are Jewish.
• A large percentage of "churches" erroneously believe—contrary to Scripture—that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt (despite Scripture saying that Christians are the new temple), that sacrifices will be re-instituted (despite Scripture saying that Jesus was the final sacrifice to end all sacrifices), that Jews will rule over the nations in the Millennial Kingdom (a Jewish myth), and that we should never speak ill of the Jews (this is derived from the revisionist notes in the Scofield Study Bible).

In 1930's Germany, most of the cat houses and other perverse sex businesses were Jewish owned. This is verified by history. If you find this hard to believe, take a good look at Hollywood sometime. It is entirely Jewish owned and controlled. Have you noticed how perverse it is? Have you noticed the moral and ethical lines they are willing to cross? Are you aware of the amount of pedophilia and child sex trafficking that goes on there? Do you really think this is just some sort of "coincidence"?

Over the centuries, Jews have been ejected from every European country as little as 359 times and as much as 1030 times. No other people groups have this kind of record. You need to honestly ask yourself: Why? No, it is not because of "anti-Semitism." That is an ignorant term designed to paint their opponent in a bad light while removing all eyes off of them. It is exactly the same with the ignorant terms "homophobia," "transphobia," "Islamophobia," and "anti-vaxxer." If no one is looking at them, they are free to press their agendas. These terms are slung about like weapons by the ignorant who refuse to be educated by facts and reality. If anything, the ignorant clowns hurling these terms around are alethephobes, allodoxophobes, gnosiophobes, phronemophobes, sophophobes, veritaphobes, and Deitiphobes.

Benjamin Franklin apparently wanted to use the Constitution of the United States to bar Jews from entry:

"There is a great danger for the United States of America. That great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen, in whichever land the Jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have created a State within a State, and when they are opposed, they attempted to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than a hundred years they will stream into our country in such numbers that they will rule and destroy us, and change our form of government for which Americans have shed their blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within 200 years our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews, while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands.

I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jew forever, your children`s children will curse you in your grave. Their ideas are not those of Americans. The leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land, and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil its institutions.

They should be excluded by the Constitution."

He was not wrong. In fact, a great many world-famous men have had a lot of insightful things to say about the Jews, from the times of Jesus on up to our present times. Do you honestly believe all these men, from various nations, eras, ethnicities, etc., were nothing but "anti-Semites"? What is the common denominator in every single one of these cases? It is the exact same result with the Muslims; wherever they go, there are problems. Why is it that Jews and Muslims are always the common denominator in their situations? Do not be so naive and gullible to fall for the age-old narcissistic psychological excuse of, "It's not my fault; it's always everyone else's fault." When everything is always everyone else's fault, that should be a red flag.

Here is something that you should ponder over promptly, especially professing Christians:

"You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can’t criticize Israel..." —Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache

Jews are some of the most "racist" people on the face of the planet. Observe from their Talmud:

"For murder, whether of a Cuthean (non-Jew) by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty" Sanhedrin 57a

"Murdering Goim (non-Jews) is like killing a wild animal" Sanhedrin 59a

"Whatever a Jew obtains from robbery of a Gentile (non-Jew), he may keep" Sanherin 57a

"A Goi (non-Jew) who pries into the Law must be killed ..." Sanhedrin 59a

People are hard on Muslims for the amount of "racism" found in the Qur'an and Hadiths against Christians, Jews, and pagans, yet Jews have the exact same amount of "racism" found in the Talmud against Christians, Muslims, and pagans.

Contrary to the lies continuously spewed and regurgitated by Semitophiles, we are not "morally obliged" to stand up to threats against Israel. You will find no such declaration in God's Word! The only place you will find such blatant rubbish is in the revision of the Scofield Study Bible (see next post). If you compare the original, the notes say something entirely different.

Now let us look at the most disgusting, repulsive, grotesque statements made in the Talmud, the Jewish bible.

"When a grown man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for when the girl is less than three years old, it is as if one puts a finger into the eye - tears come to the eye again and again; and so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years" Kethuboth 11b

"...but when a small boy [less than nine years of age] has intercourse with a grown-up woman he makes her as 'a girl who is injured by a piece of wood [masturbating]." Kethuboth 11b

"When a grown man has had sexual intercourse with a little girl less than three years old or when a small boy less than nine years of age has intercourse with a grown up woman, or when a girl was accidentally injured by a piece of wood [during masturbation] ... there is in regard to them no charge of non-virginity" Kethuboth 11a

"Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that" Sanhedrin 52b

"A Jew may sodomize a child as long as the child is less than nine years old" Sanhedrin 54b

"MISHNAH. A GIRL OF THE AGE OF THREE YEARS AND ONE DAY MAY BE BETROTHED BY INTERCOURSE; … IF SHE WAS MARRIED TO A PRIEST, SHE MAY EAT TERUMAH." Niddah, 44b

"GEMARA. … R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his." Sanhedrin 55b

These verses should be enough to turn any decent person's stomach, whether they are Christian or heathen. Do these verses sound like something any normal individual would support? This is absolutely disgusting and deplorable. Jews should condemn such teachings, and if they do not, if they are unwilling to do so, that tells you all you need to know about them. The reader should consider that Kethuboth 11a-b are part of the Mishnah or "Core Doctrine" of the Talmud.

When laws have to be passed barring perceived or assumed "anti-Semitism," such as the one recently passed by Governor Ron DeSantis in Florida, that should be a red flag. Any time anyone exposes the Jews, they are automatically labeled falsely as "anti-Semites." As I said, this is an ignorant term designed to paint their opposition in a bad light while removing all eyes off of them. Any law that is ethnic-specific, whether Jewish or Muslim, should be a red flag. The law should be equal for all people and all religions. If you cannot criticize Islam or Judaism, then likewise you cannot criticize Christianity, Hinduism, or anything else. If Muslims get to walk away from their job in the middle of their shift to "pray," then so too ought Christians, Hindus, Jews, etc., be able to do the same thing. Current laws are intent on protecting Muslims and Jews, but there are zero laws protecting Christians. This is hypocrisy wrapped up in agendas. Christians are the only people that everyone agrees it is okay to hate, harass, and discriminate against. In most countries, you can criticize God, Christianity, and the Bible, but you cannot criticize Israel or the Jews. Red flag!

Why is it that when you criticize Jews or expose them for what they are doing to and against your people and your country, they threaten the province, state, or country they are in with economic collapse? Something to think about. Manipulation, blackmail, and ultimatums are not the behaviour of the "good guys."

The current nation of Israel has no religious significance. Zionism is a heresy. Jews have no supremacy whatsoever, and definitely should not be worshipped (as Dispensationalists seem intent on doing). Today, according to God's Word, it is those who have the same faith as Abraham who are God's particular chosen people—Christians. The Jews were given 490 years to fix their ungodly behaviour. They doubled down in their sin, rejected the Messiah—Jesus, and were expelled from the land. The Bible no where teaches another return to the land. God did not bring them back to it in 1948—Zionists did. (They even considered some land in Turkey and some land in modern Kenya.) God's Word states emphatically that if Jews were to be brought back to the land, they would have to return to God. A return to God would mean accepting Jesus as the Messiah, which they have never done. Jews are not saved on account of their "race." If they want to receive salvation, they must receive it in the exact same manner as everyone else. The nation of Israel and the Jews are nothing special. If you have been hypnotized and brainwashed to believe otherwise, then you need to undergo de-programming.

While we are on the subject of de-programming, it is imperative that you know that there is no such thing as a "Judeo-Christian" religion. Christianity does not have "Jewish roots." Even the Jews recognize this. Observe:

"You will notice that a great difference exists between the Jewish and the Christian religions. But these are not all. We Jews consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other...we emphasized that there is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian religion... There is not any similarity between the two concepts..." —Rabbi Maggal, President, quoted in the National Jewish Information Service, August 21, 1961

Jews have abandoned the faith of Abraham in place of the traditions of the Pharisees. Their religion has just gotten more Satanic over the centuries. Even Freemasonry is a Jewish Institution. In 1855, Rabbi Isaac Wise wrote:

"Masonry is a Jewish institution, whose history, degrees, assignments, signs and explanations are of a Jewish nature from beginning to end,"

Remember when Jesus said, "From everyone who has been given much, much will be required" (Luke 12:48)? Even in their cursed state, being wanderers and vagabonds, God still blesses the Jews. Why? Because with all the underhanded things they do to others, cheating and deceiving people; with all the hatred and discrimination they display against non-Jews, especially against Christians by blaspheming the Lord Jesus ("Jesus fornicated with his jack ass." Sanhedrin 105a-b); with their constant rejection of the Messiah, they continue to heap mountains of coal upon their own heads. They are "digging their own graves" for when they stand before the Judgment Seat of the Lord. Two thousand years later and they still hate Jesus the Messiah with every fiber of their being. Again, God never brought the Jews back to the land—Zionists did.

Covidian Cult Refuted

In case you were interested in knowing the facts and seeing the evidence, here is the reality:

2018 World Population: 7,631,091,040
2019 World Population: 7,713,468,100
2020 World Population: 7,794,798,739
https://worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-by-year/

2018 All-cause Deaths: 57,625,149

2019 All-cause Deaths: 58,394,378

2020 All-cause Deaths: 59,230,795
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/number-of-deaths-per-year?time=2018..2021

2018 Death Rate: .76%

2019 Death Rate: .76%

2020 Death Rate: .76%

For help with your calculations:
https://calculatorsoup.com/calculators/math/percentage.php

[ What you're looking for here is the option "Y is WHAT percent of X?" ]

How much would you like to bet that 2021 is going to reveal a significant increase in the all-cause deaths and the death rate?

Gee, I wonder what could be attributing to that...

I will give all the Covidian Covidiot Vaxtard Cult clowns a moment to think about it...

*Jeopardy music playing*

Let's face it; last year they re-branded Influenza, and this year they are re-branding the common cold.

In 2018 and 2019, we had all sorts of deaths from Influenza. In 2020, we apparently had all sorts of deaths from "COVID"—the Wuhan Virus. When you look at all-cause deaths, you can clearly see that there was no change in the overall total percentage of deaths. This would not be the case if we were really in some sort of a pandemic.

Wait until the numbers for 2021 are released. How much would you like to bet that 2021 is going to reveal a significant increase in the all-cause deaths and the death rate? This will include the rise in murders in Liberal-run cities in the USA as well as all the deaths that have occurred since the roll out of these faux "vaccines." Just for kicks, I am going to guess-timate an approximation of .86% to .96% death rate for 2021.

We are not in a "pandemic"; we never were! You have been lied to, and you swallowed it hook, line, and sinker because you lack the cognitive ability to critically think and be objective for yourself.

Climate Alarmists Refuted

For all you climate alarmist clowns out there who deny real climate science, allow me to educate your obvious ignorance.

What percentage of the Earth's atmosphere is carbon dioxide (CO₂)? If CO₂ is the biggest issue we face today, then surely you clowns can tell us, right?

The amount of CO₂ in the Earth's atmosphere is .04%! Go ahead, look it up!

Human beings around the world create 3% of that .04%. Canada's contribution to CO₂ emissions is 2% of 3% of .04%! Would anyone like to do the math on that?

What is 3% of .04%?

3% ÷ 100 = .03

.04% ÷ 100 = .0004

.03 x .0004 = .000012 x 100 = .0012%

3% of .04% is .0012%

What is 2% of that 3%?

2% ÷ 100 = .02

.02 x .000012 = .00000024 x 100 = .000024%

2% of 3% of .04% is .000024%

Canada produces .000024% CO₂!!!

INCONVENIENT FACTS CLIMATE ALARMISTS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW

Inconvenient Fact #1: Carbon dioxide is not the primary greenhouse gas.

Inconvenient Fact #2: The warming effect of CO₂ declines as its concentration increases.

Inconvenient Fact #3: First and foremost, CO₂ is plant food.

Inconvenient Fact #4: In the last four ice ages, the CO₂ level was dangerously low.

Inconvenient Fact #5: 140-million-year trend of dangerously decreasing CO₂. [If you believe this false evolutionary dating.]

Inconvenient Fact #6: Our current geologic period (Quaternary) has the lowest average CO₂ level in the history of the Earth.

Inconvenient Fact #7: More CO₂ means more plant growth.

Inconvenient Fact #8: More CO₂ helps to feed more people worldwide.

Inconvenient Fact #9: More CO₂ means moister soil.

Inconvenient Fact #10: Recent Inconvenient Pause of 18 years in warming, despite rise in CO₂.

Inconvenient Fact #11: CO₂ rose after the Second World War, but temperature fell.

Inconvenient Fact #12: Modern warming began long before SUVs or coal-fired plants.

Inconvenient Fact #13: Melting glaciers and rising seas confirm warming predated increases of CO₂.

Inconvenient Fact #14: Temperatures have changed for 800,000 years. It wasn't us. (This Inconvenient Fact deserves to be repeated often.)

Inconvenient Fact #15: Interglacials usually last 10,000 - 15,000 years. Our is 11,000 years old.

Inconvenient Fact #16: Each of the four previous inter-glacial warming periods was significantly warmer than our current temperature.

Inconvenient Fact #17: The last interglacial, ~120,000 years ago, was 8°C (14°F) warmer than today. The polar bears survived. Greenland didn't melt.

Inconvenient Fact #18: Temperatures changed during the past 10,000 years. It wasn't us.

Inconvenient Fact #19: Today's total warming and warming rate are similar to earlier periods.

Inconvenient Fact #20: It was warmer than today for 6,100 of the last 10,000 years.

Inconvenient Fact #21: The current warming trend is neither unusual nor unprecedented.

Inconvenient Fact #22: Earth's orbit and tilt drive glacial-interglacial changes.

Inconvenient Fact #23: We are living in one of the coldest periods in all of Earth's history.

Inconvenient Fact #24: Earth has not had a geologic period this cold in 250 million years. [If you believe this false evolutionary dating.]

Inconvenient Fact #25: The only thing constant about temperatures over 600 million years is that they have been constantly changing. (This is a recurring Inconvenient Fact.) [If you believe this false evolutionary dating.]

Inconvenient Fact #26: For most of Earth's history, it was about 10°C (18°F) warmer than today.

Inconvenient Fact #27: IPCC models have overstated warming up to three times too much.

Inconvenient Fact #28: For human advancement, warmer is better than colder.

Inconvenient Fact #29: A return to the temperature at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution would lead to famine and death.

Inconvenient Fact #30: Only 0.3% of published scientists stated in their papers that recent warming was mostly man-made.

Inconvenient Fact #31: Science is not consensus and consensus is not science.

Inconvenient Fact #32: More CO₂ => fewer droughts.

Inconvenient Fact #33: Higher temperature => fewer droughts.

Inconvenient Fact #34: Forest fires across the northern hemisphere are decreasing.

Inconvenient Fact #35: More CO₂ >> CO₂ fertilization >> more soil moisture >> faster tree growth >> fewer forest fires.

Inconvenient Fact #36: More CO₂ in the atmosphere means more food for everyone.

Inconvenient Fact #37: The Earth is becoming greener, not turning into desert.

Inconvenient Fact #38: Growth seasons are lengthening.

Inconvenient Fact #39: More CO₂ and warmer weather mean more world food production.

Inconvenient Fact #40: EPA: Heat waves are not becoming more frequent.

Inconvenient Fact #41: Extreme heat events are declining.

Inconvenient Fact #42: Cold kills far more people than heat every year.

Inconvenient Fact #43: Warmer weather means many fewer temperature-related deaths.

Inconvenient Fact #44: Warmer weather prevents millions of premature deaths each year.

Inconvenient Fact #45: More CO₂ and warmth mean shorter, less intense heat waves.

Inconvenient Fact #46: The number of tornadoes is decreasing.

Inconvenient Fact #47: The number of tornadoes in 2016 was the lowest on record.

Inconvenient Fact #48: Deaths from tornadoes are falling.

Inconvenient Fact #49: There has been no increase in frequency of hurricanes in recent data.

Inconvenient Fact #50: We have seen 250 years of declining hurricane frequency.

Inconvenient Fact #51: No significant increase in hurricane intensity due to warming.

Inconvenient Fact #52: The population of polar bears is increasing.

Inconvenient Fact #53: There are more polar bears now than we've had for 50 years.

Inconvenient Fact #54: Polar bears are thriving even where sea ice is diminishing.

Inconvenient Fact #55: There is no historic correlation between CO₂ and oceanic pH.

Inconvenient Fact #56: The oceans did not become acidic even with CO₂ at 15 times modern levels.

Inconvenient Fact #57: Sea-level increase began >15,000 years ago.

Inconvenient Fact #58: Recent sea-level rise began 150 years before the increase in CO₂.

Inconvenient Fact #59: Melting the northern polar ice cap would not increase the sea level.

Inconvenient Fact #60: Most of Antarctica is cooling and gaining ice mass.

Funny... melting ice caps supposedly prove "Global Warming," but growing ice caps do not prove it is all utter nonsense? Yep. All sounds like legitimate "science" to me. This is why only the dumbest of the masses still trust the lame-stream media.

Flat-Earthers Refuted

Flat-Earthers are hilarious! I cannot believe there are still people alive who actually believe this complete and utter nonsense. Well, let's set to educating their ignorance...

The circumference of the Earth is roughly 24,901.461 miles (40,075.017 km). Round that to 25,000. Divide by 360 degrees. You get 69.44444 miles per degree.

A 25,000 mile circumference has a diameter of 7961.78 miles and a radius of 3980.89 miles. The diameter and radius are through the Earth—not around it! Anyone with half a brain cell who can do basic math knows that half the circumference is 12,500 miles, and 1/4 of that is 6,250 miles.

25,000 ÷ 360° = 69.4

12,500 ÷ 180° = 69.4

6,250 ÷ 90° = 69.4

This is what consistent mathematics looks like. These affect the surface area. Diameter and radius affect the cross section of the Earth—not the circumference!

The distance between Toronto, ON and Mooretown, ON is 140 miles.

140 miles ÷ 69.4 = 2.0173°

Follow the mathematics demonstrated here, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riv3x1h, and it is an approximate drop of 2.47 miles between the two points. [I have tried returning to this video with no luck. Rather than opening the link from my Facebook in its original location and then copying it, I copied it directly from my Facebook, which tends to cut off links at a certain length. The fact the video ID is only 7 characters, as well as it displaying zero info about the video or account, leads me to believe the above is the case. I have tried finding the video back with no luck. If I ever do, I will update the link as it is extremely important.]

Can you see the curve with the naked eye over 140 miles?

Flat-Earthers need a re-education in basic mathematics. Their mathematics and charts are flawed, attempting to apply a flat surface to a curved surface.

Is it not interesting that belief in a flat Earth predominantly occurs north of the Equator? Why do you suppose that is? When you look up at the night sky in Alaska, you see one set of stars, but if you look up at the night sky from the Falkland Islands, you see a different set of stars. In the northern hemisphere, when you look up at the sky in the north, you can observe stars rotate counter-clockwise around the north celestial pole, while in the southern hemisphere, when you look up at the sky to the south, you can observe stars rotate clockwise around the south celestial pole. This would be impossible with a flat Earth. The motion of stars cannot happen in a flat Earth, which is proof that the Earth is round and rotates around its axis.

Flat-Earthers are a joke. They are being intellectually dishonest, demonstrating intellectual bankruptcy, and committing intellectual suicide.

Flat-earthers refuted:

https://flatearth.ws/

https://www.boredpanda.com/lake-michigan-curvature-flat-earth-gregpagel/

https://creation.com/refuting-flat-earth

Scientism is NOT Science!

I do not care how many "peer-reviewed" journals your work appears in; show me the evidence! (Was it even "reviewed" by anyone to begin with? Who used the scientific method to reproduce your results?) Show me the process you used to come to your conclusion. If your work starts and ends at a hypothesis, and consists of zero experimentation and observation (you know, that pesky little thing known as the 'scientific method'), then your work is not science. It might be science-fiction, pseudo-science, non-science, and just pure nonsense, but it is not science. Do not call yourself a "scientist" if your work does not involve or follow the scientific method. Speculation is not science. If you cannot test and observe the results, then what you are telling people is, at best, nothing more than fictional story telling (like most the information told to people about dinosaurs/dragons), or, at worst, false religion (like the information told to people about "Big Bang" and "Evolution"). Scientism is not science!

"What is science? People talk glibly about science; what is science? People coming out of University with a Master's Degree or a PhD, you take them into the field and they literally don't believe anything unless it's a peer-reviewed paper. It's the only thing they accept. You say to them, 'Let's observe, let's think, let's discuss'; they don't do it. 'Is it in a peer-reviewed paper or not?' That's their view of science. I think it's pathetic. Going into Universities as bright people, but coming out of them brain dead, not even knowing what science means. They think it means peer-reviewed papers, etc. No, that's Academia, and if a paper's peer-reviewed, it means everybody thought the same, therefore they approved it. An unintended consequence is that when new knowledge emerges, new scientific insights, they can never ever be peer-reviewed. So we're blocking all new advances in science, that are big advances. If you look at the breakthroughs in science, almost always they don't come from the center of that profession; they come from the fringe, people who see it differently. The finest candle makers in the world couldn't even think of electric lights. They don't come from within, they often come from outside the breaks. We're going to kill ourselves because of stupidity." —Allen Savory

"If it’s consensus, it's not science. If it’s science, it's not consensus. Period. Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid." —Michael Crichton

"Peer-review" amounts to a hill of dung; it is worthless and useless and akin to "consensus." You get a bunch of like-minded fools to agree with your erroneous and far-fetched imaginations and then attempt to label it as "science" (as with the "Big Bang" and "Evolution"). They participate in their own mutually-affirming dance. Whenever people invoke "consensus" or "peer-review," I know not to take them serious as they obviously don't have a clue what in the world they are talking about.

"In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." ―Galileo Galilei

The Abuse of "Christian" Leaders

https://rumble.com/vqiu9z-full-interview-church-pastors-were-bribed-to-buy-into-this-evil-agenda-onta.html

"As it turns out, it looks like the tyrants don't need to confiscate our firearms after all in order to enslave us. Pastors and Churches are leading the way for America's voluntary enslavement -- all in the name of safety." —James Perloff, Covid-19 and the Agendas to Come, 2020, page 186.

It is absolutely disgusting how "Christian" leaders and "shepherds" in these institutions uncritically signal-boosted government-paid-for propaganda concerning the Wuhan Virus and these experimental mRNA gene therapy medical devices falsely called "vaccines," all to achieve behavioural modification. This is a gross abuse of the trust that has been placed in them by their flocks and the community! This is spiritual abuse and manipulation. It is disturbing that these leaders were willful agents of propaganda. It is even more disturbing that some sold their souls for money offered for them to be agents of propaganda.

Several of these false leaders aided in labeling the truth as "conspiracy" and "satanic." These leaders have had egg on their face for quite some time, and still do. None of them have ever made a retraction of their own devilish behaviour. How can the Gospel go forth, and how can anyone trust the "Church," when you have criminals like this actively working against the truth to promote disinformation propaganda?

"Christians" who use manipulation and twist Scripture to say, "Loving your neighbours means receiving these injections," should be ashamed of themselves. You are no better than a Jehovah's Witness or a Mormon when you do this. False teacher Rick Warren even accused Christians of being "unloving" for not wearing a mask, saying that, "Wearing a mask is the great commandment, 'Love your neighbour as yourself.'" He goes on to say, "One of the responsibilities of faith leaders is to tell the people to trust the 'science.'" Not to trust the Lord. Which "science" is he referring to? Warren is so unqualified as a "Christian" leader that it is ridiculous.

The phrase "trust the science" is meaningless in the scientific world. You never trust the science. Questioning science is science. Otherwise you would still be drinking cocaine (Coca-Cola), giving kids cough syrup with heroin (Bayer), spraying people with DDT (the 'miracle cure' that could kill mosquitoes and end Polio), and smoking the cigarette brand your doctor recommended (https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/doctors-smoking-cigarette-1930-1950/). You need to trust the scientific method, the practice of experimentation and observation. When the truth is not on your side, you have to rely on manipulation, smearing, gaslighting, jamming, and intimidation.

Christians are supposed to be ministers of the truth. This means all truth. Christians are supposed to "Know the truth. Speak the truth. Stand for the truth." So why did these "Christian" leaders not do precisely that? Why did some of these "Christian" leaders accept monetary bribes in order to help spread the propaganda? These "Christian" leaders conspired to subvert the truth. Each and every one of these leaders is disqualified from ministry! These leaders must be forced to step down. They have abrogated their authority and the trust extended to them.

Like I said before...

https://bereansdesk.blogspot.com/2021/09/the-hired-hands-exposed.html

"You Don't Know My Heart"

"Don't judge me! You don't know what's in my heart!"

I do not have to know your heart; I just need to see what you do with your body, because what you do with your body will tell me exactly what is going on in your heart.

Do not think that there is some sort of strange dualism or dichotomy within you that you can somehow separate one part of you from another part of you. You are what you are before God. Do not use this excuse that your heart is devoted while the rest of you is not! That is simply not true! Your heart is the control center of everything that you are. What you see in the mirror is what you see in your heart. Do not talk about a love for Christ that is not proven. Do not talk about a devotion to Christ where there is no evidence for said devotion.

Choose this day whom you will serve. "As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord."

Do Not Neglect Gathering Together

"And let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing." Hebrews 10:24-25

Hebrews 10:25 only means that Christians should meet together regularly (specifically for encouragement and spurring on to good deeds)—not that the meeting together has to be convenient for large numbers, or that it has to be in a building designated for that purpose.

The government is not causing us to ignore the preaching of the Gospel by their unlawful restrictions. You do realize that many countries do not allow you to build such buildings (which should not exist in the first place; Jesus did not give His Bride a temple to worship in because we are that temple)? Believers in these countries do the same as in Scripture and meet from house to house. "Traditional" does not equal "biblical". Your experience of "church" does not translate to the biblical standard. Your creed, confession, catechism, constitution, statement of faith, system of theology, etc., must be filtered through the Bible—not the other way around. The Bible must be your absolute authority!

If Paul taught the same things in every congregation (assembly; gathering), then why is there such a huge disconnect between what we read in the Scripture and what we have experienced in our various denominations?

If you bother to look into this, you will discover that these departures began with the Early Church Fathers. Let's look at a few:

• The "fellowship" was "the breaking of bread." They came together over a full meal. How'd we get to tiny cups and wafers/crackers/pieces of bread, etc.? The meal was the focal point of their gathering; not a sermon.
• Baptism was done immediately on the spot (not by immersion; circumstantial evidence obliterates this imposition upon Scripture from an eisegetical reading of Romans 6:3-4), regardless of whether their profession was genuine of false. Why? Because baptism, like circumcision, is a sign/seal of being in covenant with God; it is a witness/testimony for or against us. The Early Fathers created longer and longer delays as well as ridiculous reasons as to why it should be postponed, such as whether or not you were married.
• Membership required only one thing: the indwelling Holy Spirit. This has changed over the centuries to the point where joining a "church" (a building, which is often nothing more than a corporation) is like joining a club. Jump through these hoops, agree to this nonsense, and you are in.

Stop ripping random, isolated verses of Scripture out of their immediate context and forcing your ideological beliefs and subjective experiences upon them! You are to conform yourself and your beliefs entirely to the Word of God. The Bible never conforms to you or your perverse desires!

Do You Think It Is Okay For Christians To Be Cremated?

The reason I ask is because years ago I heard Christians discussing it and condemning cremation. Their reason? Jesus would not be able to "rapture" you. Putting the unbiblical doctrine of the "Rapture" aside, there are several flaws with these people's thinking. How many Christians were burned alive for their beliefs? Are you honestly trying to tell me that these extremely devout Christians will not be in heaven simply because someone burned their bodies to nothing? How many Christians were blown to bits and pieces in modern wars? Are you honestly trying to tell me that these Christians will not be in heaven because their bodies were in pieces and much of them could not be found? What about Christians who lost limbs? Do you honestly think they will be resurrected and still be missing those limbs?

Clearly your biblical understanding is limited and extremely askew. Jesus created your body from the dust, and if to dust you returned (as the body does when it rots), He can certainly re-create your resurrected body (which He will have to do anyway since your body will not exist after decades and centuries).

"Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body." (1 Corinthians 3:16-17)

Yes, our body is a temple, but I am afraid many Christians lack proper understanding of this verse and, like many others, rip it out of context to force it to mean whatever their wicked heart desires it to mean in the moment. If our body is a temple, what does that mean if a mortar shell explodes beside us and rips our body to shreds? Are we any less a temple of the Holy Spirit? "Oh no! Johnny got blown to bits and pieces by a nuke! Guess he's not indwelled by the Holy Spirit anymore. We won't be seeing him in Heaven."

Who says cremation is a "pagan" practice? Pagans buried bodies, too, especially certain types of burials that we seem to mimic. Maybe cremation was the new practice because they needed to preserve land since burial takes up so much space. If you take every graveyard across the world and put them together, how much space does that eat up? Maybe cremation was the new practice to thwart plagues and the like (especially when they did not bury them 6 ft deep). If Christians died from plagues, and their bodies had to be burned so that others would not get infected from it, does that mean that person is lost to history and will not be resurrected and in Heaven?

If from dust we came and to dust we will return, does it actually matter how we return to dust? Something to think about.